If No Dempsey ,Who Fills the gap ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jul 12, 2018.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,526
    36,081
    Jan 8, 2017
    If,god forbid ,Dempsey had never laced up the gloves ,then who iyo fills the gap between 1919 to at least 1926 ?Who takes the belt from Willard ?Would Tunney have come along earlier perhaps?
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Assuming Wills doesn't get a shot (at least for a while)?

    Dunno might get passed around like a Christmas Turkey.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fred Fulton?
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,572
    27,216
    Feb 15, 2006
    Fulton or Miske would probably have been up next for Willard.

    Wills probably gets frozen out anyway.

    I can't see anybody except perhaps Wills, holding the title for too long, unless they remained inactive.

    Having a weak champion, might just have played to Wills advantage, because he might have become the only big money fight for them.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  5. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Fred Fulton had the huevos to give Sam Lanford a shot at himself. Fulton was 6'-4" and
    a SOUTHPAW. Maybe had the skills to outpoint Willard....then lose to Wills in a title defense.
     
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,526
    36,081
    Jan 8, 2017
    As I see it to .Title would probably change hand's a few times till Tunney turn's up .Personally I'd hate thought of no Dempsey ,to big a part of history and one of the most interesting heavyweight s to grace the sport .
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.