If ODLH wins vs. Pac, what will be your P4P listing?

Why would you put DLH there when it's obvious that he is picking on a smaller easier opponent? :huh

 

are you serious? :huh

if its a bad beating, then its

1. jmm
2. pac
3. calzaghe
4. pavlik
5. vazquez

but i have no problem if someone interchanges nos. 2 & 3

 

He is an irrelevant fighter at this point. He doesnt get into the top 10. Depending on how Pacquiao loses he might drop 2 to 4.

 

You're going to put Oscar at number two for beating Pac? The ****'s the matter with you?

 

Jmm.

 

depends...if it goes to a decision then
Pac
Jmm
JC

if by Ko

JMM
JC
Pac

 

My ranking right now:
1. JMM
2. PacMan
3. Calzaghe

Of course when and if Pac, the WW fighter in the David Diaz fight, actually loses to a WW, he'll be off the top 3 that's for sure. Whether to put Oscar up there or not is a good Q, it depends on the win vs. And whether Calzaghe can earn a spot above JMM (therefore the #1) beating the old Roy is another good Q. Maybe outboxing and outsmarting, something Tarver and Johnson failed to do (they outfought him).

I see JMM ending the year at the same position as he's now on my ranking: legitimate and much deserved P4P champion based on his win over PacMan on my card and beating the lineal LW champion as well.
Joe stays #2
Pavlik-Hopkins winner is #3 if there's a knockout

 

That's ****ing laughable. The top 3 will stay completely unchanged when Oscar beats Pac. Why the **** should Pac be punished for having the guts to take on an unwinnable challenge, and Calzaghe rewarded for taking the easiest fight available? Your lack of boxing understanding is embarrassing.

 

I'd keep it the same

Marquez
Calzaghe
Pacquiao

 

Its gonna be the same for me:

1. Pacquiao
2. Marquez
3. Calzaghe

 

Calzaghe
Pacquiao
Marquez

 

It wouldn't change Pac's standing.

Calzaghe's standing shouldn't change if he lost to a cruiserweight, or JMM if he lost to a junior middleweight.

 

Exactly. An oasis of logic and objectivity in a desert of bias and stupidity.