If Pac did a sucker punch to win a fight...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Knickerbocker, Sep 19, 2011.


  1. Anima

    Anima Kinetic Link Full Member

    6,205
    438
    Nov 12, 2010
    Nobody is talking about legitimacy of the shot *****, Because It's as clear as day that the shots Floyd threw was legal and it ain't even debatable.
    The issue was the morality of it. Hugging Floyd's nuts could really distort the way people think.
     
  2. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    Another non-hypothetical.
    Holyfield-Dokes. Dokes repeated low blows. Holyfield responds with a blatant low blow of his own.
    The difference?
    Dokes goes down, takes a break. Then the two men go back to business and Holyfield kicks his ass like a real champion.
    That's ring justice.
    Mayweather concocted a moment when neither his opponent, nor the ref was looking, and sucker punched his opponent for a knockout.
    Big difference, and easy to see why one guy's retaliation for fouls is acceptable and the other's is not.
     
  3. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    We lost all those wars because our freakin' government are so freakin' corrupt and gutless, and our ecomy has been and perhaps will always be poor.
    National funds always go to one project -- the betterment of our politicians' pockets.

    If Pac wins a seat on a national position (i.e. senator) I'm out this **** country. FACT.:good
     
  4. Bodyshot99

    Bodyshot99 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,732
    17
    Dec 18, 2010
    "you yellow, dog-munching *******"

    (
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    That fight was a draw. They stopped it in the 6th round due to an "accidental" headbutt in round 2 that ****ed Pacquiao's eye up. I guess Mayweather should've done like Pacquiao and let Ortiz continue to cheat so that the fight could end up in a bull**** draw, or worse, a loss for Mayweather. Fact of the matter is, Ortiz was cheating his ass off. The fight had restarted, Ortiz decided not to defend himself, got hit, and then continued to not defend himself. He got exactly what he deserved. If Pacquiao doesn't care if another fighter continously fouls him, that's on him. I don't see why that should count against Mayweather when he retaliated in a legal manner.
     
  6. Bodyshot99

    Bodyshot99 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,732
    17
    Dec 18, 2010
    "you yellow, dog-munching *******"

    (NO RACIST)

    but it would be fair and legal, people would probablyu be mad that he would do it though because of his persona
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Look what you're saying, retaliating with an illegal blow is ok, but retaliating with a legal punch is not.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    A point docked would have been sufficent

    In answer to the OP the *******s would defend it and the *****s would complain about it, it would be reverse world.

    Let's see how many on this thread will condone Pacquaio hitting Marquez when he was down
     
  9. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    First of all, this argument that it was clearly legal isn't true.
    First, I haven't seen or heard a clip where Cortez can be clearly heard saying time in. But let's say he clearly did.

    The second problem is Cortez, if he did "SAY" time in, he did not act like time was in. If he called time in, then he should have been paying attention to the fight. He obviously wasn't.

    Ortiz was looking at Cortez waiting for him to do or say something to indicate the fight was ready to resume. Cortez wasn't paying a bit of attention to the two fighters, indicating to the one fighter who was looking in his direction that action was still halted.

    If that's the case, then Cortez needs to face some major reprimands and sanctions, because he either didn't say time in, then gave a guy a bogus KO, or his words and his actions gave the fighters completley different signals about what was going on.
     
  10. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    :patsch

    Oh, you mean the stuff that you and your fellow TRUE FANS are doing... that "Battered Wife Syndrome" you're suffering under is alive and well...

    I definitely don't feel sorry for you and your fellow victims. The Pretty One deprived you of an ending and performance you could brag about...:rofl Now you're left with defending a disgraceful LEGAL punch... hahahaha sucks to be you guys... :good

    To the TS I've already stated that if Pac did what Mayweather did and was proud of it... I would disown him, because SEEING GHETTO **** like that isn't the reason why I'm a fan of Pacquiao... :hat
     
  11. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    Did you win the Vietnam war ? Iraq or Afghanistan?
     
  12. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    :think

    This_and_that... It's best to ignore any of MW posts. If you didn't know he's already known around here as one of the dumbest posters around and an overall clown. If you engage in a debate with him you might get his "stupid" on him... :hey

    And yes I agree, Filipinos would abandon Pacquiao in droves if was to end a fight like that and then try to defend it. And then on top of that go irate over a person like Larry Merchant. I stated over again that Pacquiao would lose my support if acted ghetto. For a vocal ignorant minority they have NO MORAL COMPASS they eat this ghetto **** up... :smoke
     
  13. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Hush now, his homeland is still suffering from all those famines and widespread rapes.
    Give the slave trade product a break.
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    He did say time in, watch the fight again.

    And tell me why exactly Mayweather should be looking at Cortez in that situation instead of his opponent? If Cortez restarts the fight, there's no reason for Mayweather to be looking over at him. So it doesn't matter what Cortez was looking at as Mayweather wasn't, and shouldn't have been, looking at him.

    Cortez said time in, and both fighters touched gloves. Ortiz then got hit with a left hook. It was only after he got hit with that punch that he looked at the official. So you're telling me that Mayweather is supposed to stop because his opponent is looking at the official? I don't think so. Fighters complain to officials during a round all the time, that doesn't mean the round isn't still going on.

    The head of the NSAC confirms that Cortez did say time in. So neither Cortez nor Mayweather did anything wrong according to everyone that counts. That leaves on person at fault for what happened. For some reason though, many people on here are happy with letting him off the hook.
     
  15. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010