If pac dominates cotto ...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by daredevil1989, Jul 25, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    I'd give Pac his props. I like pac anyways even though I dont' want this fight to hapen it will be exciting.
     
    paloalto00, Jul 25, 2009
    paloalto00, Jul 25, 2009
    #31
  2. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,302
    Jan 4, 2005

    Thats because everytime, before a fight, all the doubters have their "reasons" as to why pac will loose, and when he wins AFTER the fight, all the doubters have their "excuses". You can make all the excuses you like for ODLH, fact is, noone was using thsoe before the fight, the common concensus was ODLH was gonna kill Pac. Afyer the fight, anything can be twisted to be made out as a logical reason to descredit the victory.
     
    dangerousity, Jul 25, 2009
    dangerousity, Jul 25, 2009
    #32
  3. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    I totally agree.

    I also didnt understand DLH and the weight. Who the hell is watching and helping him with that? It just dint make sense at all
     
    CHEF, Jul 25, 2009
    CHEF, Jul 25, 2009
    #33
  4. zarman

    zarman Guest

    cotto just beat clottey so yer i would give him massive prop.
     
    zarman, Jul 25, 2009
    zarman, Jul 25, 2009
    #34
  5. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    glad someone agrees man when have you ever seen oscar cut the ring off effectively or has he ever boxed southpaws effectively. Oscar has never been able to deal with movers very well
     
    daredevil1989, Jul 25, 2009
    daredevil1989, Jul 25, 2009
    #35
  6. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,350
    16,507
    Dec 6, 2008
    Agree with this. Pac gets some credit for beating DLH like that, but you gotta believe DLH was drained, not Pac's fault. I'm not saying he would't have beaten him other wise. If he would have struggled more with that DLH version it would be different. But he dominated him the way he should have dominated him.

    Hatton? No excuses, he got dominated.
     
    Babality, Jul 25, 2009
    Babality, Jul 25, 2009
    #36
  7. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009

    DLH was drained and you would be a fool to not believe he wasn't. He hadn't fought at 147 in almost 10yrs. With age, it's harder to cut weight. Still, Pacquiao got all the credit from me. Why do you think Roach agreed to fight DLH at 147 but won't fight Cotto at 147?

    Still, if Pacquiao beats Cotto even at 145, he will get credit - no excuses (at least from my part).
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jul 25, 2009
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Jul 25, 2009
    #37
  8. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,716
    17,238
    Mar 5, 2006
    Its not a question of "IF", its "WHEN".:smoke
     
    DobyZhee, Jul 25, 2009
    DobyZhee, Jul 25, 2009
    #38
  9. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007


    Finally! :lol::good

    Cotto beats PAC 100% credit for Cotto
    NO EXCUSES!
    PAC beats Cotto - 100% credit should go to pac too
     
    Silvermags, Jul 25, 2009
    Silvermags, Jul 25, 2009
    #39
Page 3 of 3