If Pac had beaten Floyd, he would have been on the cover of Ring Magazine's Cover

if floyd dominated pac with kd's and or ko he would be immortalized as a true great but it clearly showed he is not. despite having all the advantages, he played scared, very defensive, just scored points to win, and avoided engagements at all cost that should have show cased their talents as atg's. it just confirms that he is scared of pac and avoided him since their first negotiations.

 

No it proved that he would always outbox any version of #48 and #48 wasn't skilled enough to beat PBF and force his fight on PBF. If he was willing to sell out like Maidana or even Hatton he might have had a little more success. Your hero wasn't as brave as you thought he was and was thoroughly thrashed accordingly.

 

You must have missed boxing from 2001-2010 because that's the only way this ignorant post could have been expressed.

 

Pacquiao would have destroyed mayweather in 2009. Pac is shot and faded.

 

Exactly. Floyd knew the Pac would destroy him in 2009 so he waited.

Floyd understood the inevitable destruction that would happen. So he schemed.

 

It's obvious to even Ray Charles that Mayweather's

This content is protected

far too dark to be on the cover of Ring Magazine.

 

No thats not all there is to it.

Its a bigger deal because Mayweather is undefeated and calls himself the best ever. So it would have been a big deal to beat Mayweather.

Beating Pacquiao is not such a big deal and rightfully so.
Pacquiao during the time frame of the 4 or 5 years of waiting for the fight to come to fruition, had been boxistically thoroughly dominated by Marquez in fight 3, and then brutally put to sleep in a 4th fight.

Tell me how feasting on leftovers gets you magazine covers?

 

You mean the same #48 who was going life and death with JMM?
If that's the case then why was PBF the favorite in the fight back then? When will people like you realize that PBF is stylistic nightmare for him? The same problems that #48 had on fight night back in May would have been the same ones he would have had back in 2009 except it would have been worse because #48 was more flawed more limited and more reckless back then.

 

Great point actually

 

You must have missed boxing from 1997-2010 because PBF was undefeated and only lost a handful of rounds up to that point mean while #48 had several losses and lost to a shot Erik Morales and couldn't even beat JMM convincingly.:deal The only way that ignorant wishful thinking and novice post you made could have been expressed.

 

Good point. What's great about beating a shot Pacroid after he's already been starched multiple times?

 

The last time I checked PBF didn't run away from the fight because of testing he agreed to all demands #48 didn't he fought Clottey instead.:hi: Arum and Roach always knew PBF was a stylistic nightmare for #48. Roach even said on several occasions that he needed more time to prepare for PBF he knew what #48 was up against unlike his overzealous dumbass fans who went to bed mad on May 2nd and are still bitter to this day.

 

How many ATGS were knocking out top opposition at 38 years old?

 

Pac on roids certainly would have made it a tougher fight but he refused the tests because he was more juiced than Ivan Drago.

 

For the last time who ran from testing back in 2009?:hi: Even Roach said that the reason the fight didn't happen was because they didn't want to do testing. Yet your delusional ass refuses to admit it. PBF made #48 look like a amateur it was easy work one of his easiest fights on record hell Berto gave PBF a harder fight than #48 did, that right there tells you everthing you need to know.:rofl