If Pac is fighting Floyd's "leftovers", I guess Floyd has fought nothing but....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by osreyes77, May 4, 2011.


  1. PNoyFightFanUSN

    PNoyFightFanUSN Larry Don't Give a **** Full Member

    6,836
    2
    Apr 9, 2010
    once again. dissecting **** is pointless. Fighters are not made of glass (some of their jaws but a style change can protect that), they are not all ruined by a single loss or even a bad loss right away as many people so strongly believe.
     
  2. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    LOL!! I have never put these two quotes together before. Pretty hilarious. What a blatant duck
     
  3. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    It is pointless to people who refuse to be objective.

    Didn't say people are ruined by a single loss, all I said is the analogy he made is a bad one. Nevertheless, Freddie Roach believed that the aforementioned losses had considerable affect on those fighters.
     
  4. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    And People wonder why he gets critisized so much from everyone . Floyd brings this on himself .
     
  5. osreyes77

    osreyes77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,296
    1
    Nov 14, 2010
    Exactly! He was putting a whoopin on Paulie and McGirt had to stop it.
     
  6. PNoyFightFanUSN

    PNoyFightFanUSN Larry Don't Give a **** Full Member

    6,836
    2
    Apr 9, 2010
    It's easy to be objective if you're only considering your points. I counterpointed, feel free to argue back.
    Freddie Roach is also a liar until he says something people find incriminating.
     
  7. Zak2

    Zak2 Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    0
    Oct 30, 2009
    If Floyd wasn't great no one would care.
     
  8. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    I already addressed your 'counterpoint'.... if there was one.

    Nice try.
     
  9. ttunnel rat

    ttunnel rat Member Full Member

    214
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Hatton always fought that way. It's just that Pac took advantage and capitalized on the weakness in Hatton's style, that is all. Much like what George Foreman did to Frazier. It's not that Hatton or Frazier suddenly dumbed down their fighting style that's why they got brutally KO'ed.
     
  10. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    :rofl JMM ain't no Pacman leftovers. JMM was more than Pacman could chew is more like it.

    Peepee Man 1 Pacman 0 Draw 1
     
  11. u29236

    u29236 Active Member Full Member

    1,117
    0
    May 29, 2010
    :roflOscar ain't no Floyd leftovers. Oscar was more than Floyd could chew is more like it.

    Oscar 1 Floyd 0 retirement 2 = 1 w Oscar + 1 w Manny
     
  12. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    This guy speaks da truf :deal
     
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010

    That is so idiotic and pointless, this one post really does qualify you as one of the five to seven dumbest people I've read on this site. Please shut the **** up, this pisses me off so bad. You can go through every opponent on everyone's resume and list those who have beaten them before, all it does is reiterate what everyone knows and illustrate how you need to map it out to remind yourself and post in an attempt to diminish someone you envies accomplishments. You're pathetic.
     
  14. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    :yep
     
  15. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Only problem is that the choice was Margarito or Baldomir for the belts, history, and more money. Only on the planet of Pacanus does that comment not make sense. That is obviously where you are living.