you will still get the same answers like "PAC wouldnt stand a chance!", "MAB dismantled a fast, strong puncher Hamed, PAC gets KO'd before rd1", "MAB is a complete fighter..PAC's not"..etc, etc!! Point is, what's the use of pitting him (imaginary:hey) against great fighters (i can fairly say he has been compared to almost everyone his weight:nut) when you cant even accept his chances of defeating them? Thus What happened to PAC-MAB1??...luck i pressume??:huh
Nope Pac was just better than the public thought he was, but remember up until this fight happened he was untested at that level
