And Bradley clearly wins the fight and gets robbed on the scorecards.... What will Pac haters say? Will they say Pacquiao should be 0-2 against Bradley? I'm just asking because of the double standards they have, saying that Pac is 0-2 in his last fight, choosing to point out the "robbery" against Marquez (which wasn't a robbery it was a close fight) and ignoring the official result, yet they are willing to acknowledge the official result against Bradley (which was a robbery). :think
Most people have Pac 1-1 the people saying 0-2 are in response to people saying he didn't lose either of his last two bouts. I had Marquez Pac 8-4 and Pac Bradley 8-4, both about the same level of robbery imo. Either way official results or public opinion pac is 1-1 in his last two bouts.
Nope Pacquiao-Marquez wasn't a robbery. Pacquiao-Bradley was, you can make a case for Pacquiao winning at least 7 rounds against Marquez. Rewatch the Bradley fight and tell me which of rounds 3 to 9 you can make a case for Bradley winning, as if you give rounds 1 and 2 to Bradley, and 10-12, he would need at least 1 round from 3 to 9 for a draw and you can't make a case for Bradley winning any of them.
Pacquiao is hands down the most hated fighter on ESB. It would be impossible for him to win a close decison in most people's eyes, either a loss or a robbery and no in between whatsoever.
