If Pacquiao is a shot fighter, then how come he easily beat up rios and chris?

Tbe

 

Because there is a difference between shot and ****.

 

manny and mayweather are both elite. they will make good fighters look like ****. rios is loads below pac and we will know if algeri was just a flop when he gets his next few fights. i remember when he beat provo all the threads saying he beats any and all 140 fighters.. hererra beat provo first so its not an amazing feat. i hope hes great just to prove it was a great win

 

Pac is not shot..........................

 

prime pac is a god among men...

shot pac is extraordinary to good fighters...

right now pac is just ordinary for floyd....and vice versa :hat

 

He's not shot, but they aren't top ten in his division either. If he and his team weren't worried about decline, he'd have fought Khan, Brook, Thurman, Alexander, or Porter.

 

it was confirmed by the pacult, when they say he is "shot" it's because he was badly ko'd by a 40 yr old that's been in more wars than him.

they are saying his chin is gone. saying he is completely shot just makes them feel better

 

There's 2 logical options here for Pac****s. Either they start admitting Algieri and rios aren't the monsters they make them out to be (otherwise 'shot' Pac would have lost) or they admit that pacquiao isn't shot and then can carry on claiming those 2 are beasts. Can't have it both ways.

 

Past prime pac is levels above rios and algheiri obviously.

 

And Bradley.

He beat Bradley comprehensively a year ago.

 

Thats was Bradley on 1 leg....and Tim was rocking his cradle to....but it wasnt because he was shot....

 

A very declined Pac can easily beat these guys that's why that's how good Pac is.