If Ricky Hatton had beaten Mr.Mayweather back in 2007, would his resume beat Joe's?

Easily but IMO his resume is already better than Calzaghe's, at least Hatton had a go against the best fighters in their prime.

 

Why don't you indulge your other hobby more......i.e. sucking cawk.

 

Yeah, Hatton already has a better resume.

 

yes, not even debatable imo

 

Just because Hatton fought Mayweather and Pacquaio doesnt mean he has a great resume: he got ko'd by both. If he had won it would have been different.

 

Obviously. That win alone would have given him the better resume.

He didn't even come close though. Round 9 was beautiful from Mayweather.

 

His record at the moment is 50/50 with Calzaghe anyway, a win over Mayweather would blow him way above and beyond.

 

This guy is absolutely clueless atsch

I wish your dad would've withdrawn and spat you all over your mums saggy tits.

 

Hatton relied on hometown referees and judges for most of his fights and his best win was against a shot to **** Tszyu with a crooked referee letting Hatton foul the whole fight. Hatton also has a Glass Jaw and was brutally and embarrassingly KOed in his 2 biggest fights.

But he has a better resume than Calzaghe? :huh

 

Without a doubt, win over Floyd alone would be more than anything Joe did, but Hatton wasnt even close...

 

If he won no one would put Joe in the same sentence with him. But he just wasnt at their level.

 

That would be a tenfold improvement on his actual best career win. (prime Mayweather is so far beyond a faded Tszyu it boggles the mind)

I can't even wrap my head around the idea of a world in which Hatton beat him. That would be nuts.

Then does he still go on to get knocked out by Pacquiao?

WTF does that leave everyone to have quibbled about on here the last seven years?