If Spence is overrated so is GGG

Go to bed

 

And Jacobs and Canelo faced Spence? What on earth is the point you are trying to make here cause I can't find it for the life of me?

Spence is overrated. I've been one of very few on this forum always sceptical of Spence, never fully buying into him. And last night the reality has begun to unravel.

 

1. They didn't.
2. What the **** does this have to do with Spence?

The only comparison you can make (which you haven't) is the Brook fights. Spence lost loads more rounds than GGG against a broken Brook who had weight issues.
GGG lost 2 rounds and knocked him the **** out.

 

How the hell did Canelo win the first fight v GGG?

 

If Spence fought that Clenbuterolled ginger good, lawd. It would have been a massacre.

 

Amazing how everything leads to GGG and subsequently the argument of how he beat Canelo.

All roads used to lead to Rome.

 

Another oddball comparison that means nothing.

 

*All Roids lead to Rome.

 

Oh come on. There was this guy who wrote a sheet on how AJ would school Ali. I think I saw that thread resurface recently.

 

I wouldn't go that far.

It was only a couple of months ago we had someone genuinely asked who'd win between Tyson and GGG.
Or notjustacasual failing to count to 12.
Or the one where he said that Wilder would fight anyone then I destroyed it.

I mean this is pretty ****ing bad as well.

 

By eating illegal cow balls

 

This must be so incredibly deep, because I don't understand the connection and the quote at all.