If the belts are so important..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PATSYS, Nov 24, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Then why doesn't JMM go after another beltholder in the division, somebody like Joan Guzman, for instance? :scaredas: :scaredas:

    Word. :yep :yep
     
    PATSYS, Nov 24, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 24, 2007
    #1
  2. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005

    Do you really care about what JMM does?

    This is not about what JMM can do....it is about what Pac can do. You are a Pac fan so you shouldn't worry about JMM or Guzman legacy, you should worry about Pac's legacy.

    Who cares if JMM fights Guzman or not.... the question is .....why Pac is not fighting these guys?
     
    Thinman, Nov 25, 2007
    Thinman, Nov 25, 2007
    #2
  3. 4Rounder

    4Rounder Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,274
    21
    May 14, 2006
    So now you are saying that he is the belt chaser this time. :lol:
    Your circus never ends. :rofl
     
    4Rounder, Nov 25, 2007
    4Rounder, Nov 25, 2007
    #3
  4. runnynose

    runnynose Member Full Member

    138
    0
    Aug 13, 2007
    If Pac gets past David Diaz, it's probably just logical for him to face the winners of JMM vs Guzman and Edwin Valero vs Michael Katsidis, Chris John vs Jorge Linares and In Jin Chi vs Jorge Rodrigo Barrios.
     
    runnynose, Nov 25, 2007
    runnynose, Nov 25, 2007
    #4
  5. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Who is JMM anyways? Just a cheap beltholder who can't even command a prize.:rasta
     
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    #5
  6. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Hoops, typo...he he he. PRICE.
     
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    #6
  7. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    are you pacsexuals becoming like the joy boys?

    protecting your boy like that,
     
    Relentless, Nov 25, 2007
    Relentless, Nov 25, 2007
    #7
  8. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    We can not just have everybody wait in line for Pac, it is unfair. JMM should do his share.

    If JMM beats Guzman, I do not see any more reason for Pac-JMM not to happen.
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #8
  9. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    You or your likes are the ones who has been giving weight to JMM's belt when he negotiates with Pac. So if the belt is so important, why the hell is your boy desperate to fight a guy with no belt? :tong

    Bottomline, belts are almost worthless and your boy should have came forward much earlier when Pac/top rank made an offer to him.

    So now, you wanna bet JMM will punk out of a Guzman fight?
     
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    PATSYS, Nov 25, 2007
    #9
  10. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    How about JMM GUZMAN fight, then VALERO JMM, then jmm chis john and if PACMAN is in the mood to toy with JMM do it on 2013. by then PACMAN is already 34...hehehehe
     
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    rjamesd1, Nov 25, 2007
    #10
  11. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    IF you want to place Pac as the top dog and p4p #2 then some standards must apply to him. Fighting David Diaz is absolutely unacceptable.
     
    maciek4, Nov 25, 2007
    maciek4, Nov 25, 2007
    #11
  12. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    pathetic post. how about jmm fighting john? he got whooped by nobody :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
    double standard boi ;)
     
    johnco, Nov 25, 2007
    johnco, Nov 25, 2007
    #12
  13. Raden

    Raden Southpaw Full Member

    378
    0
    Apr 21, 2007
    Acceptable or not, we have nothing to do but watch...

    Go Manny Go :happy:happy:happy
     
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    Raden, Nov 25, 2007
    #13
  14. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Absolutly disgracful post. Chris John was a real WBA champ, undefeated, after a defence of his title, he is still undefeated. On top of that JMM fought him in his own backyard and got robbed. David Diaz is a guy who was dominated and TKOed by Kendall Holt, its like Kendall was a class above him. He got his title by beating very old Eric Morales and Morales was robbed.
     
    maciek4, Nov 26, 2007
    maciek4, Nov 26, 2007
    #14
  15. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Let us assume that your post about JMM is correct and that he shouldn't have fought a "nobody" as you call John. That doesn't excuse Pacquiao from doing the same thing, it simply makes JMM as guilty as Pacquiao. Point is, Pacquiao is STILL guilty. So you haven't really done much but jump on a sinking ship trying to discredit someone else's point.
     
    kg0208, Nov 26, 2007
    kg0208, Nov 26, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2