If the klitschko's didn't have such a physical advantage how good would they be?

LMAO - go back to /b/ - Troll.

 

-Pac without PED

(My bad, my bad...)

 

i agree no other weight other than heavy has to deal with the same disadvantages as weight and height. they only have to deal with boxing skills speed and power..:bbb

 

Not much to think about.

 

Thats a dumb question. What if Carl Lewis had know legs :!:

 

If Marciano wasnt American would he have been so popular or remembered for his record??

The OP is just trying to discredit the Klitchskos.

If Tyson wasnt to fast he would have never been anyone.

 

The unreal thing about the Klits is that big men dont usually have movement of that much coordination, also they tend to tire and throw very few punches.

Vitali is huge and has a tremendous work rate
Wlad is huge and moves like a cruiser

Thats what makes them special

 

The fact is that they do have these physical advantages. You can blame them for being taller and having a longer reach than you can blame Micheal Jordan for his leaping ability. I think they are both very good fighters that are technically sound yet have flaws that none of these current crop of crappy heavyweights can take advantage of. I do not think the question is why do they win but why haven't they lost recently.

 

That's a stupid question. That's like asking how good would Ray Robinson have been without his speed?

 

AHAHAHA . . . you did not use SRR in the same breath as the KBROS . . . LMFAO

 

LMAO this was a good LOL. Thank you.

 

Yes great tactics by Byrd to be seven rounds down after 8, and using positive thinking to cause injury to Vitali's shoulder. Perfectly executed game plan.

 

That's like asking how good Tye Fields would be if he didn't have such a physical advantage. Or Julius Long.