If The Ring strip Fury will you still consider him lineal champ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by james5000, Jan 29, 2018.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
  2. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,162
    6,709
    Feb 20, 2009
    And now he's unretired & the lineal champ.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Nah, when you retire you renounce your lineal claim. This is why Ezzard Chrles is recognised as lineal from 1949 and why Frazier is lineal from 1970, why Hart was lineal from 1908ish. Because Louis, Ali and Jeffries respectively retired. They didn't rebecome lineal once they unretired. That's not how history has worked i'm afraid.

    And Fury hasn't unretired yet anyway. If we suspended all possibility of new lineage every time he opened his mouth it'd be never ending, and illustrate why a fighter who unretires cedes his claim. A fighter of a mind could prevent new lineage being seeded literally until his death, for fifty years if every time he started training everyone re-installed him as champ.

    It just doesn't work. Life goes on.
     
  4. Sandman_

    Sandman_ Undisputed Full Member

    5,162
    6,709
    Feb 20, 2009
    Ali didn't retire. He was stripped by officialdom. Frazier didn't truly become lineal champ until he defeated him.

    And determining who the real champ was back in the day wasn't such a hard thing to do given there was only one of them.

    The point of the lineal championship is that it's won and lost in the ring. It's not conferred by officialdom or a media/fan popularity contest.

    Like it or not, anyone wanting to stake a claim for the lineal championship today needs to go through Fury.

    Unless of course they can lure Lennox Lewis out of retirement.
     
    juppity likes this.
  5. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,031
    2,224
    Nov 7, 2017

    No, that won't do. Your history is as wrong as it could possibly be. When Jeffries came out of retirement it was to wash the Hart, Burns, and Johnson reign from the history books. So that record keepers would have down Jeffries from 1899-1908. With no mention of the unforgivable blackness. He failed, that's why they're lineals. Johnson validated Hart and Burns by defeating Jeffries.

    Secondly, it happened loads of times. My favorite instance to site is Burke-Ward. Deak Burke was denied his championship status by previous champion Jem Ward coming out of retirement and claiming it five or six times before Deaf'Un finally forced Jem in the ring with him.

    Jem would retire and "The Fancy" or matchmakers/backers of the day would establish a championship match for the new champion to be crowned. Deaf won, Jem would announce that the match was not championship material so he'll come out of retirement to be champ a little longer. Jem avoided fighting Burke but did fight and was recognized as champion. So Burke would get to be champion for a few months then Jem would have it wiped from history, where it remains. After fighting a few exhibitions and **** like that Jem would retire and select his choice for the next guy to be champion. Burke would whoop that guy, once killing a poor ******* named Byrne, and Jem would repeat the process until the Fancy had enough of him and forced him to either remain retired, they wouldn't put up a purse for him again, or fight and beat Burke. Jem even got his own kin's ass whooped for them with young Nat Ward suffering a brutal KO at the hands of Burke in Jem's quest to keep the title from the hands of the next champion.

    CJS in Bare Knuckle 1722-1895:
    This content is protected



    Like I said, that's my favorite, not the only. There's 300 years of history to cover in covering lineal.

    So yeah, if Fury fights he is the lineal champion and there's not dick anyone can do or say to change it. Sorry buds, I'd love it if an undisputed came but they're still only lineal as long as Fury stays retired.
     
  6. like a boss

    like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,576
    8,857
    Jul 30, 2012
    There's little glory in a reward system no two people can even agree on.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,648
    21,954
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well technically the last champion was Gene Tunney really.

    Fury never lost his belts in the ring but he did declare himself retired and unable to defend his belts.

    There's always gonna be an argument that he's lineal until he loses, but for me, I don't consider him true champ any more.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,648
    21,954
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah but he's only lineal as long as Lewis stays retired.
     
    GlaukosTheHammer likes this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, I don't think that's true at all.

    I don't think that if Ali had defeated Frazier the reign of Joe Frazier would be unrecognised.

    This is because he was recognised as the champion in the interim.

    As was Johnson.

    And if Wilder fought Joshua, that would result in a new lineal line. The idea that if Fury came back and lost, say, to Gary Cornish that Cornish would be recognised as lineal is laughable.
     
  10. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,031
    2,224
    Nov 7, 2017
    Nice to know what you think and that you believe conjecture outweighs precedence.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    As I explained, precedence backs my position.

    That said, it's possible (though unproven) that the climate involved with the Johnson-Jeffries fight would have resulted in a short-term nullification of Johnson's reign as recognised at that time. But certainly Joe Frazier was recognised as the champion when he met Ali, despite Frazier's unretirement.

    In the end, what people think is what makes a lineal champion. It does matter that nobody has replaced Fury in the interim, that does make what people think - opinion - more vital. But again, nobody that matters will recognise Cornish as the legitimate heavyweight champion of the world should he beat Tyson Fury on his comeback fight. And it's because he retired.
     
  12. minemax

    minemax Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,993
    4,783
    Nov 10, 2017
  13. Scyson

    Scyson Active Member banned Full Member

    751
    467
    Oct 14, 2017
    I don’t class drug cheats as champions.
     
  14. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,206
    27,916
    Jan 18, 2010
    I don't understand why the Ring has had so much issues stripping him? The whole reason he could keep it is due to technicalities and other ways to explain their rules. You can say he already broke 5 of them (while only one is needed), but if you get into lawyer territory, you can find holes in there that technically could be explained as that Fury violated none up until this point. It's quite a funny set of loopholes in Fury's case, as I mentioned before.
    It seems to me that they just went out of their way to prevent a lawsuit from team Fury, rather then going by the actual maning of their rules instead.

    If you ask me (you probably won't), they should rewrite these rules to close up the glaring holes, so they won't have to wait years and years in coming cases.
    The "scedule fight" loophole is ridiculous, as an unwilling to defend big name boxer can never officially retire and just keep sceduling fights and pull out for years citing injuries and such, until their intention to never fight again or wait for that huge payday offer that might never come is clear to all.
     
    Pretty Boy Floyd and minemax like this.