No. If he defeats Juarez and then he fights Pac and defeats him, and then he fights Pac again defeats Pac again and then he defeats lets say Guzman then he has a chance to be part of the HOF. Pac has defeated MAB and then he lost to EM, then he beat EM and then he recycle.
Common people . . . wake up . . . JMM's best acomplishment is salvaging a draw with Pac after getting KDed three times. HOF???? :-( :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Thats asking a lot for JMM. Your requirement is a little steep. There is no way he is going to have those fights in succession. After the Juarez fight, it would probably be Pac or another tune-up if the Pac fight does not materialize. With an average of 2 fights a year, that is 4 fights before he reaches 36. Unless you envision him to be like hopkins or Foreman, that would be another interesting thread: do you think JMM would still be fighting after 36?
his style dictates that he could fight till 40 if he wanted to. honestly, I'd pay money to watch him counterpunch a bunch of cabdrivers.
47 (35 KOs) - 3 loses - 1 draw Marco Antonio Barrera Jimrex Jaca Terdsack Jandaeng Cris John - Lost Victor Polo Orlando Salido Manny Pacquaio - Draw Derrick Gainer Marcos Lincona Manuel Medina Hector Javier Marquez Robie Penden etc etc Does that resume fits the Hall of Fame? :think This content is protected :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
My requirements ?.....You asked me a question and I gave you an answer. This is not my envision. I am a boxing fan. Thats it. If JMM can not make it, then thats not my problem. That would be his problem....don't you think?
Would you be a little merciful, sir. So I believe that if you would be in the HOF board or whoever that finalizes the HOF names, JMM is not in that list. That is a big problem that JMM has!!
No. Sorry. If I have to decide right now he won't. There is no way that I can say that he is a HOF at the present. The same goes for Pac, I cannot say that he is an ATG.
atsch Do your homework friend.....Barrera and Jandeng were both riding 6 fight winning streaks when they lost to Marquez. I'm not questioning Pac's competition, he's fought some tough fighters, but lets also take note that out of Pac's last 7 fights, those good fighters we talk about had lost in their fight previous to Pac...... .....a sign that those good fighters were already on there way down. Thats all I'm saying. Its still a good resume for Pac. Good fighters, but by no means was Pac dismantling fighters at the top of their game!
JMM beat Jandaeng who lost to Guzman. Who the **** is Jandaeng anyway? Pac destroyed MAB 4 year before JMM beat MAB very very narrowly, whom Pac again totally dominated in MAB's very next fight. JMM has a long way to go and a lot of catching up to do before he can be a HOF material. His best shortcut to it is thru Pac and he better be not a hardcase in negotiating a rematch.
You keep saying narrowly, but saying it is'nt going to make it so! 116-111 116-111 and 118-109 Unanimous for JMM! So many in this forum and others like this have been insistent that nobody cares about JMM. That he is boring..... What the hell did boxing or the judges have to gain by falsely giving JMM the fight by those types of scores????? Again, Unanimous with the judges and just about Unanimous with the scoring boxing media!:deal