If there was a compulsory retirement age of 35 for all boxers who's legacy would be most harmed?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Mar 5, 2017.


Page 3 of 3
  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    truth hurts yes? ok
     
    HerolGee, Mar 9, 2017
    HerolGee, Mar 9, 2017
    #31
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Man, a lot of the low hanging fruit got picked off lol.

    Apologies if I've already missed it, but I'll add Antonio Tarver to the list.

    If he had to retire the day he hit 35, he gets the Jones loss on his record, but doesn't get the Roy knockout.
     
    Rock0052, Mar 9, 2017
    Rock0052, Mar 9, 2017
    #32
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Wlad loses a lot, too. 9 defenses are off the books, including Haye, Povetkin, Pulev, and Jennings.
     
    Rock0052, Mar 9, 2017
    Rock0052, Mar 9, 2017
    #33
Page 3 of 3