WHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAATTTTTTT!!!!??? I mean Joe Louis had like 20 title defenses??? Where are these H2H behemoths??!?1ß!!?1
Check my comments in the top 50. Note Louis record here, and how he struggled vs guys who were NOT as good as the OP listed, that were also ranked in the top 50. The fact is he struggles vs guys who were smaller and gifted top 50 ratings. So why would he clean the clocks of a bigger and better bunch? Logic says he would not.
It isn't any one particular fighter that proposes the risk. It is the depth of the line-up. A lot of skill and athletic ability stacked up in unrelenting order, moreso than he faced (or could be asked to face). He's going to lose one or two in this run.
To be fair, you missed out Baer, Bivins and Sharkey. Whatever Bivins has to do there.... Lets do this with Riddick Bowe: 1. Muhammad Ali 2. Joe Louis 3. Evander Holyfield. Bowe 2-1 4. George Foreman 5. Larry Holmes 6. Rocky Marciano. 7. Sonny Liston 8. Joe Frazier 9. Jack Johnson 10. Jack Dempsey 11. Ezzard Charles 12. James J. Jeffries 13. Jersey Joe Walcott 14. Mike Tyson 15. Gene Tunney 16. Harry Wills 17. Sam Langford 18. John L. Sullivan 19. Max Schmeling 20. Max Baer 21. Floyd Patterson 22. Ken Norton 23. Riddick Bowe 24. Bob Fitzsimmons 25. Joe Jeannette 26. Jimmy Bivins 27. Jerry Quarry 28. Jack Sharkey 29. Archie Moore 30. Sam McVey 31. Cleveland Williams 32. Lennox Lewis 33. Earnie Shavers 34. Jim Corbett 35. Ernie Terrell 36. Michael Spinks 37. Jimmy Young 38. Zora Folley 39. Ingemar Johansson 40. Ron Lyle 41. Tim Witherspoon 42. Jimmy Ellis 43. Mike Weaver 44. Michael Moorer 45. James J. Braddock 46. Tommy Farr 47. Tommy Burns 48. Tommy Gibbons 49. Pinklon Thomas. Bowe 1-0 50. Michael Dokes. Bowe 1-0 A guy who fought half professional, half regular client at Burger King....
The list you've provided has Louis at #2, which you presumably disagree with. Yet you want to use the list to denigrate Louis's opposition. You are using a list you yourself consider flawed to prove the guy at #2 doesn't deserve to be at #2
The list is not mine, and my comment showed his results. You can not disagree with them. I think a guy they put at #2, who lost or struggled more often than not vs the vs. their top 50 doesn't belong at #2. Also take note they felt the 30's was the low point in heavyweight boxing Famous sells. Hero's sell. Louis was both. I have Louis in my top 6, not # 1-3, and that's with some pressure from others. But aside from what I think what record do you think Louis would have vs the 12 listed? Since your reading reading, and replying, why not comment to the OP?
On the other hand the toxic name "bum of the month" could have tainted The Ring. If they can be so affected by "hero's sell" they can certainly have they're point of view skewed by something as negative as "Bum of the Month." But it doesn't really matter. There's nothing that reveals bias so completely as selective use of data. "Here's a list that doesn't flatter Joe Louis!" "But it has him at number 2?" "Ah well, the writers of the list were badly affected by hero worship..." "Then how can we trust it?" "..." "How can we trust the list if the writers are so easily affected?" "LOUIS BAD."
He's a great fighter ,I've got him in my top 5.If Joe was fighting those mentioned ,at 3 fight s a year and near enough at his prime ,then he beats em all . Some won't be easy ,never said that ,but Joe would find a way .No one on that list was ever not stopped ,no one did what Louis did or fought like him. So I'm confident ,unlike some ,that Joe beats em .He'd be there at the end of 12 fight s unbeaten. Now if he ws facing Holmes, Foreman ,Lewis etc then it's a different story.
He would probably beat them all, but there might be a couple of close calls, as there were against his own opposition. The aspect that you can't anticipate, is the focus that this title reign would bring upon him. Everybody on that list would be looking for the blueprint to beat Louis, and learning from the mistakes of their predecessors!
Yes that's correct, they would. But that applied to Holmes, Ali ,Wlad ,Hagler ,Monzon etc.Being a great or Long reigning champion ,they Carry that extra something special. A mixture of skills and strength s to enable you through different style s of opposition. We're talking 4 years ,12 Challenger s of varying degrees of strength s but I believe Louis would find a way through the minefield .Won't be easy ,he'll struggle, be hurt and more than likely knocked down on occasion, but he'll find a way . It's not bum of the month club but their not world beaters either ,no disrespect to em but I don't see em winning.
He's not making it through that list unscathed. Yes, I'd favor him to beat each one in an isolation bubble. But in actuality, and having to make it through the years without a loss is a little too much. It's possible because it's Joe Louis, but I wouldn't bet on it.
I just saw your previous post. The focus would be the important issue. If they were all one-off's you have to favor Louis. But over the long haul it would get dicey with that consistent level of quality.