If this is true:::pac is a bigger sham than i thought

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IVLG, Dec 10, 2009.


  1. IVLG

    IVLG OBJECTIVITY IS BACK LOL Full Member

    582
    1
    Nov 24, 2009
    For fear of getting banned I wont link to the site; where I got the following information, but it comes straight out of the mouth of respected trainer RON FRAZIER if you curious to get the exact article, then search around, and you should find it no problem or hit me up in a Private Message, and i'll give it to you. FIGHT HYPE

    A Wool has been pulled over the eyes of boxing fans everywhere. In the Pac v DLH, and Pac v Cotto fights, in addition to their being catch weights of less than the welterweight limit of 147 lbs, their was also a "REHYDRATION CLAUSE" a Rehydration Clause are you serious, meaning that no only did Cotto and DLH, have to cut weight to get below the 147 welterweight limit, but they were forced to stay depleted so they wouldn't enter the ring above 147.

    So not only do you have Manny Weights you got Rehydration Clauses as well, this dude fought to zombies, and is getting a pass.
     
  2. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    there was no limit vss Oscar
     
  3. maximumsg

    maximumsg Active Member Full Member

    1,490
    0
    Jul 24, 2007
  4. kisses1884

    kisses1884 New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    rehydration clause roflmaowtf!! dont believe anything you read
     
  5. cherokee

    cherokee boxfan Full Member

    834
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    oh jesus!

    how low can these *****s go!
     
  6. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006

    Wow, i would be surprised. PM me the site please.
     
  7. steele311

    steele311 Wanna Dance? Full Member

    2,248
    0
    Jan 29, 2009
    Never heard of such a thing... Is this serious?
     
  8. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Please if that were true DLH and Cotto would have used it as an excuse after they lost,theres no way those two would agree to something like that.

    You're full of **** as usual.
     
  9. cherokee

    cherokee boxfan Full Member

    834
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    steriods, rehydration clauses...what next?
     
  10. cherokee

    cherokee boxfan Full Member

    834
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    exactly!

    it's not only their title that's on the line, their pride, legacy, in Cotto's case, his country and people!

    for a male dominated sport, boxing is full of bitches!!!
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    They both still got in the ring with him and both were still bigger than him, enough excuses.
     
  12. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    I seem to recall Roach saying he spotted the needle marks that DLH had used to rehydrate himself after the weigh in.... Manny dont seem to be asking any favors off Mayweather though does he?? or is there a hidden clause somewhere??
     
  13. Sick bastard

    Sick bastard Québec city! Full Member

    74
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    paris plaster?
     
  14. CharlieGarbs

    CharlieGarbs Guest

    Cotto would never agree to a 'rehydration clause', he bulks up really big after weigh in's, it's part of his game.
     
  15. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Thats not true. Pacquaio weighed 148 on fight night while DLH weighed 147. Pac beat the smaller DLH that night.