If this is true:::pac is a bigger sham than i thought

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IVLG, Dec 10, 2009.


  1. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004

    LOL....there was nothing like that for anyone PAC faught. :lol:....if its not roids, being shot, weight drained or lucky then it's the good ol' reyhdration clause for the reason why PAC dominates!:rofl

    Look.....that kind of **** would be made public...they can't hide that kind of clause that puts the risks and health of an opposing fighter at risk. The rumor mill is in full force.:yep
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    What about the blantant lies and exaggerations or unwarranted rumors about ONLY PAC being on roids.:rofl yes...there are many double standards between these two groups of fanatics!
     
  3. I think I get it. IVLG is an alias specifically invented for pac-hating. Nallege? :lol:
     
  4. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    You've been here long enough to know the pac hater :yep:deal

    The same guy who said I told you so..pac is ducking PBF :rofl:lol:

    The same guy together with the other PBF fans who doesn't have the balls when asked by a pac fan! vote here if you think pac is ducking pbf!

    damn! all the pbf fans were gone! :deal

    In another thread they were feasitng and saying a lot of bull**** that pac is ducking pbf!:rofl:lol::hat
     
  5. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    PBF fans=dumb eunuchs.

    no brains. no balls.
     
  6. satan12

    satan12 Play Fast Or Die Full Member

    337
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    [SIZE="7"]KOki KaMedA!!!!![[/SIZE]/B] :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup
     
  7. Zaryu

    Zaryu Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,985
    43
    Dec 7, 2007
    I didn't read the whole thread so i don't know if this has been said before, but I think Cotto was at 158 on fight night versus Pacquiao.
     
  8. WeezyF27

    WeezyF27 Active Member Full Member

    1,228
    0
    Apr 14, 2009

    get out of here you are such a *****.. your going to come online and talk about having balls. so tough behind that keyboard.. please you are a joke..

    no one ****ing respects anything that you say.. after Floyd beats pac and that will happen.. I guarentee you will be nowhere to be found around here..
     
  9. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006

    This content is protected
     
  10. zchen

    zchen Active Member Full Member

    1,453
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    stop drinking this...
    This content is protected
     
  11. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I remember Freddie Roach saying before the DLH fight saying, "I wont allow my fighter to step into the ring if DLH is not at the Welterweight limit.......

    ......there was even a thread about it before the fight took place debating on what Roach meant with his comment......was it the official weighin he was talkiing about, or was he actually serious in his comment about "Step into the ring"....which would mean he wanted a 147 lbs DLH in the actual ring????

    That was never clarified......but it does leave one to wonder whether that was a hush clause in that DLH contract, and the reason that DLH was taped getting on the 24/7 scales and registering at or below the Welter limit a full two weeks before the actual fight taking place.


    Do you all remember a couple of weeks before the Pac-DLH fight, the threads that were around here debating whether the 24/7 scale was legit or just a bogus act to hype the fight?????

    In hindsight of course and seeing that DLH to the shock of everyone officially weighed 145 lbs and then climbed the ring at only 147 lbs........it does leave one to wonder whether there was such a clause, at least for the DLH fight........

    .......and even for the Cotto fight, how can it be explained that HBO unofficially weighed Pac and DLH right before they stepped into the ring, but did'nt do the same for Pac-Cotto.

    Pac has always allowed himself to get weighed before he steps into the ring, but that was'nt the case for his fight with Cotto.:think



    .......in any case, we can only speculate......but as long as there is'nt anyone from either camp substantiating the rumor of the rehydration clause, we certainly cant assume that it was the case, because it certainly would take away from Pacquiao's victories.
     
  12. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    If ever Floyd wins, do not go around proclaiming Floyd to be the greatest boxer in this decade. He didn't do any **** to claim that title. Beating a hype job doesn't do any good to his resume.
     
  13. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    It's pretty odd that a guy as experienced as Hoya would **** up like that. Maybe he was paranoid about not making weight and thus invoking the large penalty.
     
  14. WeezyF27

    WeezyF27 Active Member Full Member

    1,228
    0
    Apr 14, 2009
    a post that uses reasonable logic and doesn't just assume that pac is the greatest fighter in the history of the world...

    man are you going to be hated on this thread..
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Neither Pac or Cotto were weighed in on fight night.