If today's HW division is so crappy, then why can't the 90s fighters win a belt?

Do you expect anyone to bite?

 

:rofl you're a ******

 

Old Foreman did it, Old Holmes did it, old Patterson did it,
Old Weaver did it, old Walcott did it. Why cant the great 90's fighters do it???:yep:deal

 

**** off

 

great thread. Its is exactly as you say. An old Foreman and an old Larry Holmes were beating real contenders in the 90s or even won a title. Then why cant the guys who were world champs in the 90s win a title from 2000-2010 if "The heavyweight division is so weak right now"

 

The highest ranked 90's fighter is Michael Grant at #20.
Grant is 39yo, younger than Foreman when George made his come back and Michael never lost a fight in the 90s. The next is Tua at #43!
Tua was KO'ing everything in the 90's, but cant beat bums today.

 

Terrible thread.

**** off & die in a fire :fire

 

For Brittards this is a terrible thread because they are facing a reality check.

 

exactly. only those who cant take the truth hate this thread.

 

You wait to become shot and fat and make a try for yourself.

I have better question for you, since the best era in HW boxing was late
60 and 70 then why Ali, Foreman and Frazier did not try to win a belt, they are ATG,
they should have no problem beat a bunch of no hopes as these boring Klits.

 

Maybe i dont 100 percent agree with this angle of looking at it but i agree with the over all point

this isnt the worst the division has ever been, but it has been one of the most dominated periods in the division

 

He posted nothing about the 70s. The thread said "90's fighters", stupid.

 

'cause they r old and out of shape