If Tyson and Frazier Switched Eras

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by rm36, Sep 11, 2009.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    frazier would be champ longer than tyson was in tyson's era

    not sure tyson would beat ali
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,839
    44,549
    Apr 27, 2005
    Totally disagree. I think both versions might beat Tyson, but the Ali from around Williams would beat Tyson for sure IMO. Different fighter, but hell look what a lesser than Williams Clay did to the monster that was Liston.
     
  3. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    You say his KO ratio in fights that go over 5 rounds is low. Who was he supposed to knockout but didn't? A big part of it is not many of Tyson's fights went very long in the first place---and that's a bad thing? It's also a style thing too. If a guy plays a defensive game and never leaves himself open to a KO, Tyson's best solution is to win rounds. Pretty much all of Tyson's decision wins can be attributed to this.

    I guess my whole point here is Tyson had no trouble winning rounds all the way to the end of a fight if needed.
     
  4. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    A prime Tyson was a fearsome fighter. But nobody kayoed Muhammad Ali (ah, I know all about the Larry Holmes stoppage). The point is, could Tyson accomplish something that no one ever did. And regardless of the arguments put forward, Mike would have to do it within 4-5 rounds. Anything beyond that and the chance of a kayo becomes remote.

    That being said, I believe that, what fighters like Frazier, Shavers, Lyle and more pertinent, monsters like Liston and Foreman could not achieve, Tyson would also have not been able to achieve. I also believe that Ali, anytime between 1964 to 1975-76 would have the combination of speed, skill, chin, determination and ring generalship to survive Tyson's onslaught for 4-5 rounds. After this, unlike Tucker or Bonecrusher Smith, Ali wouldn't be inside the ring to survive only. It would turn into a long, hard and frustrating night for Tyson. A night like he had never faced before.

    Really dreamin' it up for Ali? Not really. I point you all to the what James Douglas, trying to be a 'Ali wannabe', did to a near peak Tyson . And Muhammad would have been the real thing, far better than Douglas.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    You can hardly claim with any certainity that he had late effectiveness when he seldom showed it. His number of KO's after round 5 is very low. That doesn't necissarily 100% disprove your position, but it hardly supports it, does it?

    Not when the guy was only trying to survive, no.
     
  6. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009

    The only times he wasn't effective were against Holyfield and Douglas, where, like I already mentioned, he was losing rounds right from the beginning. His late match effectiveness had nothing to do with it.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    On the Ali Tyson front there are some points to consider.

    Tall rangy fighters who held a lot generaly took Tyson the distance. In Ali's case this would mean a points win.

    Ali never faced a puncher in the same zip code as Tyson as a finisher. It is not a given that he will take Tysons best combos if he gets caught on the ropes.

    Ali would be absolutely remorseless in his psychological attack on Tyson and it would probably be a factor. If Ali dosn't phase you then nobody will.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    Sure, he didn't lose any effectiveness at all, his failure to score late KO's was just sheer bad luck. Sounds good to you?
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    You wouldn't say Liston was in the same zip code?
     
  10. jont

    jont Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    340
    Sep 27, 2004
    so Frazier easily beats Tucker Biggs and Thomas? or does anyone see any trouble for Joe from these guys?? I think Williams gets Kayoed by his nemesis the left hook..but some of these boxers give Joe some problems along the way....
     
  11. brando18b4h

    brando18b4h Active Member Full Member

    714
    5
    Sep 1, 2008
    I totally agree with the Boilermaker.
     
  12. rm36

    rm36 Active Member Full Member

    1,311
    8
    Jun 26, 2009
    But Tyson was a great deal faster than that version of Liston.
     
  13. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    That wasn't what I was saying at all.

    Holyfield and Douglas found/exploited other weaknesses in Tyson, as they were winning right from the beginning. This, by definition, rules out Tyson "tiring out in the late rounds" as the reason for those losses.
     
  14. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    Frazier would have gone undefeated in Tyson era until he had to meet either Holyfield or Bowe.

    But Frazier would'nt have been as dominant as Tyson was even though he most likely would have gone undeafeated, I can't imagine him putting the same fear of God that Tyson put in Spinks.

    And even though Larry Holmes was past his best in 1988, I don't think Frazier would have been able to knock him out, Holmes would have a much easier time setting his pace against Frazier though he would have likely lost.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,839
    44,549
    Apr 27, 2005
    And a juvenile Clay beat Liston soundly. He only got better. He'd match up well vs Tyson.