If Tyson beats Wilder.......

I actually wouldn't rule out the posibility of Parker beating Wilder. Again you could argue a win over Povetkin is more impressive than a win over Wilder as Povetkin has a more impressive record of the two.

Also using your logic then one fight wonders/ upsets like Hasim Rahman should be looked upon more favourably than someone with a more deeper quality record but whom doesnt possess an impressive win as beating a prime Lewis. It's like stating Rahman was a better boxer than Wlad or Vitalli.

 

Nah i disagree. I think Fury can box the ears off both but at some point would get chinned. AJ v Wilder is a case of who lands first imo.

Would love to see all 3 face each other twice but boxing fans are fickle and if any of them lose to the other then they will called bums and blah blah blah.

 

Ridiculous comparison. Fury out boxed Wlad, Rahman was a one punch KO.

 

IF Fury wins his best resume includes Wilder, Klitschko, Chisora and Hammer

IF Wilder wins his best resume includes Fury, Ortiz, Stiverne and Washington

AJ’s resume ALREADY includes wins over Whyte, Braezele, Klitschko, Parker and Povetkin

If Fury wins, I’ll put him at No 2 with his two world title wins, but with no successful defences, no unification fights and a PED suspension

However if Wilder wins, I really can’t split him and AJ. He’ll of had 9 world title fights with 8 successful defenses but again no attempt to unify any belts.

AJ will still be THE man to beat

 

Undefeated Lineal / Linear and WBC champion clearly the number one in the division. Chinny robot's team to duck the winner (and the loser) in favour of Whyteleafe III "This time its personal"

 

A resume is more than one fight. Apart from Klit, Chisora was probably Fury's best win. AJ has beat 4 of the current top 10. The fact you called me an idiot, shows what a defensive little ***** you are.

 

How can you put Povetkin in the same bracket as Hammer, Chisora and Breazeale? You can argue that Povetkin's record is better than Wilder.

 

What I still can’t understand for the life of me is why Fury didn’t go for another’s fight at least before taking on Wilder. I thought his timing was still a little out against Pizzanetta and that would worry me if I was on his team. So what if it didn’t happen this year but next year the other lot would have waited whatever happened he would have got a big fight, so unfortunately I can see Tyson getting sparked badly here and then the myth and his legacy will disappear in my eyes as it then doesn’t make the Klit win such a shock win as AJ did him too.

Must admit though if Fury wins he is without doubt number 1 and he deserves legitimate legacy status cos doing this fight in his condition is mental in my opinion, money or no money reasons involved.

 

Whoever wins is No.1

If Wilder wins he's beaten the lineal champ and a top 5 HW in Ortiz

If Fury wins he beats a young, undefeated HW champ in his prime away from home after going to Germany and schooling the lineal champ of 10 years in his backyard

For both that's better than AJ's resume.

 

Champions defend their titles. Tyson Fury never defended his title once. That alone puts him below Joshua.

 

Champions unify all titles - there appears to be one still mithing according to Chris Eubanks Snr