If Ward beats Kovalev, is his resume better than Pacquiao?

He's going up in weight to fight a prime undefeated beast. Ward beating Kovalev is much more impressive than Pacquiao beating an extremely overrated Barrera. Pacquiao probably has more solid wins, but I think Froch, Kessler, Kovalev tops Pacquaio's top 3 wins.

 

I love Pac, but his resume gets extremely overrated. As far as quantity, Pac has a better resume than Ward by far, since Pac has had almost 2x more fights and is retired. But as far as quality wins, Kessler, Froch, and Kovalev is better than Barrera/Cotto/Shot Morales.

 

Leoh we get it, you're the biggest pac fanboy. You hate ward, floyd, etc, instead of writing "lol", you want to make your point? Quantity wise Pac has a far better resume, quality wise tell me 3 wins better than Kovalev/Froch/Kessler. And no a shot to pieces Morales coming off losing to Rahim doesn't count .

 

nice argument.

 

We're talking about quality of wins. Is Pac going up in weight going to be more impressive than anything Ward will do in his career. Of course. But level of opposition wise, Kovalev, Froch, Kessler is as high as it gets.

 

What do you mean same level as Mayweather? We're talking about wins . Pac got schooled against Mayweather.

I get what your point is, but just purely quality wise Kovalev is far better than Pac beating a hatton that got knocked out already, post marg-cotto, etc. Pac never fought someone at Kovalev's level besides Mayweather at 140+. You can argue Marquez, but he lost all of his fights besides the 1st one against him, and Marquez is his size.

 

What do you mean no . Tell me 3 wins that rival that. Pac has never beat Marquez, the first was a draw, he lost the other 3. Barrera is his best win, but Barrera is overrated. Morales he shouldnt get that much credit for he was shot. Cotto was a very good win, but better than Kovalev? I dont think so.