If was either Kell Brook, or NO fight at all. Which would you prefer?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by alspacka, Jul 9, 2016.


  1. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Tbh, I choose no fight at all.


    And on a side note: I don't like that stupid **** eating grin of his lol. Once he sees that the guy that he is fighting is no threat...out pops that **** eating grin of his.....and I just want to smack his ass for no apparent reason lol.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,212
    Mar 7, 2012
    :good
     
  3. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    It's because you're very immature and emotionally stunted. You probably get angry easily. :hey
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,212
    Mar 7, 2012
    :lol:
     
  5. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,765
    4,915
    Jul 6, 2014
    Who do you think he should fight then? Who would fight him?
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Since Canelo didn't want to fight him, he shoud've told the WBC to create a number 2 guy and then 1 and 2 could've fought for the lineal MW championship which was his goal. Or move up to 168.
     
  7. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Had to lol at this :lol:

    True, but I believe #2 is Heiland :-(
     
  8. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    lol. I'd rather GG fight Heiland and get the lineal MW title than fight Brook.
     
  9. Boxing fan 75

    Boxing fan 75 Active Member Full Member

    564
    9
    May 26, 2016
    I would favor Brook over heiland at 160 and I think Brook has a better chance of beating ggg than heiland. So although heiland is more legit on paper - I actually think Brook is a better fight
     
  10. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Of course you would. How else can you justify GG taking a money fight with a WW. And I don't care who you think would win between Heiland and Brook. I'd have to see who wins to say who I better. GG took the Brook fight as a money fight and if he truly cared about the lineal MW title, he would've told the WBC that he wants a #2 contender so that he can become the lineal MW title should he win. He took step aside money thinking that Canelo would fight him. Dumb. So he had to take a money fight.
     
  11. Boxing fan 75

    Boxing fan 75 Active Member Full Member

    564
    9
    May 26, 2016
    i try to be honest. Do you disagree with my statement
     
  12. Tkbtown

    Tkbtown Quintuple champion Full Member

    391
    1
    Apr 16, 2011
  13. Steve_Fox

    Steve_Fox Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,838
    212
    Sep 13, 2014
    ducking, cherrypicking , demanding cws, draging fighter from two divisions below,

    ggg is becoming the new floyd
     
  14. Blackclouds

    Blackclouds Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,545
    1,508
    Nov 9, 2013
    I'd rather have no fight. This fight is completely pointless. ggg is becoming a serial ducker of good fights bordering on criminal.
     
  15. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,160
    15,952
    Jul 25, 2014
    Eh, I like freak shows, I'm definitely going to watch it. Just like I'd watch Mayweather/McGregor or Khan/McGregor, does that mean it's not an utter joke of a fight? No.