If we are going to give Pac credit for Cotto

This content is protected

 

Way to turn Cotto's victory into an anti Pac thread. Good job. Idiot.

 

no you are actually using the *****logic which is quite famous for pushing for ******ed ideas.

 

More like a Pac/Mayweather thread. These guys are good. :rofl

 

This thread is stupid neither deserve credit.

 

What you're using is actually 'Floyd Logic', because only a Floyd nutlicker can come up with such a thread after a great night of boxing.

 

wtf is that

 

hahaha

 

With this kind of logic, no boxer should get any credit for their wins. Only the first time boxers were not "softened up" by their opponent. But they are too green to get credit from.

 

De La Hoya had more damaging losses before he fought Floyd to much bigger men Hopkins and Sturm, aswell as the tough rematch to a PED'd-up Mosley where Mosley was hurting him late being much stronger.

Mosley lost to Cotto, Winky x2, Forrest x2 and arguably to De La Hoya before he fought Floyd.

Ortiz lost brutally to Maidana, aswell as having a draw with Peterson and getting dropped twice by Berto.

Marquez was dropped by Pac in a loss, and also by Barrera and had a gruelling fights with Casamayor and Juan Diaz before Mayweather.

Do I have to continue with Zab Judah, Mitchell, Corley, Gatti?

Almost all of Mayweather opponents at 140+ had tough losses, even Hatton had tough fights with Collazo and Urango before Floyd. All this leftover **** started by Floyd and his fans is getting old.