If Whitaker is #10 All-Time by The Ring, and Pac is NOT Top 10 material...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 17, 2009.


Page 3 of 7
  1. nastynas

    nastynas Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,935
    10
    Oct 27, 2009
    PS. Why does someone ahve to be a hater to have Pac outside the top 10? Boxing has a long history with many phenomenal fighters.
     
    nastynas, Nov 18, 2009
    nastynas, Nov 18, 2009
    #31
  2. Burg

    Burg New Member Full Member

    14
    0
    Mar 14, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, the Ring list you linked to was from 2002 when Pac was fighting Jorge Eliecer Julio and Fahprakorb Rakkiatgym which explains why he isn't on that list.

    Is there a more recent all time P4P ranking from the Ring for comparison?
     
    Burg, Nov 18, 2009
    Burg, Nov 18, 2009
    #32
  3. gigogreco

    gigogreco Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,711
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    because that ******* tranny doesnt have a life, outside of serving soup and sucking dick.

    boxing is a sport with an over 100 year old history, with fighters who have fought more times and against better opposition.

    They also seem to forget, that once upon a time, there was only 1 belt and 1 world champion, thereby making theyre accomplishments better.

    but lets forget that for a minute, so this soup serving dick sucker, can have his moment of glory:yep
     
    gigogreco, Nov 18, 2009
    gigogreco, Nov 18, 2009
    #33
  4. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    I know that man. I'm talking about people on this board talking about how he doesn't even come close to the Top 10, much less 20-30.
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #34
  5. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    This loser just proved my point. Did you even read my reason why?

    So where's your proof from history? Oh, that's right. You're just spouting bull**** out your ass.

    Go watch 100 years worth of boxing then get back to me. Because your lack of proof speaks volumes about your knowledge, moron.
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #35
  6. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    You don't have to be a hater. You just have to actually argue with FACTS why he WOULDN'T be outside the Top 10. I agree boxing has a long history.

    I just laugh that the same people who discredit Pacquiao never have any proof.

    Read my argument above your comment. Then have a similar one with facts and we can actually have a debate.

    Again, STACK UP HIS RESUME with the modern fighters in the Top 10 on the Ring's list since you're so sure he doesn't deserve to be in the Top 10.

    Then Gagoreflex and the other idiots on the board would be educated on boxing history.
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #36
  7. Tszyu

    Tszyu Active Member Full Member

    1,249
    0
    Aug 10, 2009
    JC Chavez is the most over-rated fighter of his time
     
    Tszyu, Nov 18, 2009
    Tszyu, Nov 18, 2009
    #37
  8. gigogreco

    gigogreco Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,711
    4
    Jun 21, 2008
    oh my oh my, you really are the type who cries alot, but i guess when serving soup in the day and cross dressing at night, you can hardly be blamed:yep

    pac is not in the top 10, i dont have to prove anything, its you who claim he is, then prove he is, otherwise your just a dick sucking fanboy:lol:
     
    gigogreco, Nov 18, 2009
    gigogreco, Nov 18, 2009
    #38
  9. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    LOL not a single word about boxing or the thread.

    So you've admitted to being owned.
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #39
  10. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    why do you talk like Floyd?:blood He keeps bringing back the past when he is faced with all the criticisms of the current boxing scene? Is it that hard to accept? or is it just the most comfortable way for you to answer.:think
     
    boxbox, Nov 18, 2009
    boxbox, Nov 18, 2009
    #40
  11. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    Nasty Nas, you make good points. The question I have for you though is while speculation H2H may have merit, you still have to look at what's actually on paper and who fought who. Stack up the two resumes and see what you get. If speculation how H2H might go is only 25%, then the 75% that you put in the resume needs to be broken down piece by piece.

    THAT is what I ask anyone who thinks Pac's resume isn't as good as Sweet Pea's to do.

    I did it. Do you disagree with what I wrote about the P4P comp each fighter faced?

    I don't see anyone else like Gagoreflex or Ruiney, who hasn't even addressed the topic due to a variety of things, among them ignorance...that or they know they have no argument so they just throw turds like chimps on a branch.

    This is a boxing forum, not a zoo.
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #41
  12. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    Henry Armstrong's first bout is loss via KO.
     
    Main Events, Nov 18, 2009
    Main Events, Nov 18, 2009
    #42
  13. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    That shut Ruiney up hahaha

    Learn about boxing. It didn't start in 2005!
     
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    Sweet Pea Pacquiao, Nov 18, 2009
    #43
  14. GDG

    GDG Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,663
    88
    Jun 2, 2009
    Reasons why Pac should be ranked lower than Whitaker...

    1) Pernell absolutely dominated a division in a way Pac never has.
    2) The win over JCC is far greater than any win Pac has on his resume.
    3) Pernell easily beat every fighter he ever fought in his prime. There were no tight matches like the ones against JMM....no loss like the one against Morales (with the exception of that stupid robbery against Ramirez).

    Whilst I think I'd have to agree that Pacs resume may be deeper overall, for these reasons he's still below Pernell for me.

    Whitaker = 17
    Pac = 22
     
    GDG, Nov 18, 2009
    GDG, Nov 18, 2009
    #44
  15. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    Marciano over pacquiao?

    dempsey? why? this guy was inactive most of the time. He total number of fights is less than a third of great fighters of his generation

    saddler? saddler have a hard time disposing elorde

    Arguello? Who was dropped several times in his prime
     
    asero, Nov 18, 2009
    asero, Nov 18, 2009
    #45
Page 3 of 7