If Wilder wins (which I am as close to 100% certain that he won't but I'll humor the question), he's gonna fight Ruiz who looked horrible in his last outing but is a known name and PBC commodity. There would never be a 4th fight because if Wilder wins, it would be by KO and he would say that the KO was the most decisive win in the series.
Wilder is a disgrace. His career is full of contradictions. He ran home from England without going to Russia to face Povetkin when he “popped” for .000000001 percent of meldonium which had been a legal and over the counter ingredient in found in Russia and Eastern Europe. After investigation it was found that was not enough to qualify as dirty but Wilder had already scuttled the fight by going home before the wbc that sanctioned the bout was able to rule on the fight. Then after claiming he would never fight a drug cheat he fights ancient Ortiz who twice popped for anabolic steroids. never mind how Wilder fought no one of note to earn his wbc Elimination match. Or the string of terrible defenses against Molina, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Washington, the ghost of Arreola, etc etc Even Fury was a cherry pick. A light punching inactive fat drug addict. Wilder is a sham. He turns 36 this month and is the most manufactured heavyweight since Briggs.
Reminds me of some of the terrible arguments the arbitration judge made when comparing the situation to Lewis-Rahman as 'precedent'. Particularly in the suggestion that it was unfair to run away with the titles without giving the champ a chance to take them back. Completely ignoring the controversy of the 'draw' wherein Fury should have taken the titles initially, with this second fight serving as the 'second chance'. Also funny to compare Lennox Lewis considering his 'draw' with Holyfield in very similar circumstances as Fury's (did Holyfield deserve a third?). Obviously, it was a contractual matter and I haven't studied the case, but my understanding was that the clause itself had expired and it was these questionable 'precedent' arguments that had him decide in favour of Wilder. A bit of a quack judge. But anyway, on this logic (so much as the rematch clause is presumably absent this time, so I'm not talking about the legal arguments) it would be only fair to give the champ a chance to take his titles back ... and so on ... endlessly ...
Yup. Ortiz resume is an absolute joke. It's not a popular opinion around here I know, but I think there's a pretty damn strong argument that Chisora has a better resume than Ortiz (actually, I wouldn't mind seeing them fight - especially at this point, I'd have Delboy 60/40 favourite).
Are you on crack? Of those three you mentioned Fury - Ring Magazine Heavyweight Champion Ortiz - Ring Magazine Heavyweight # 5 Breazeale - Ring Magazine Heavyweight #8 at the time. Now unranked by Ring And those are his best fights. Compare to this Joshua who since 2018 has fought Parker - at the time Ring Magazine Heavyweight #3 Povetkin at the time Ring Magazine Heavyweight #4 Ruiz - Ring Heavyweight # 5 Pulev - Ring Magazine Heavyweight #10 Usyk - Ring Magazine Heavyweight #1 and Ring Magazine Pound for Pound #2 In addition to Whyte who is currently Ring Magazine Heavyweight #4 and Klitschko, who was Ring Magazine Heavyweight Champion. And Joshua has beaten all of those except Usyk. Wilder was taken to school twice by Fury and won his first fight over Ortiz after the referee called a time out to check him for injuries he didn't have
Apparently Fury may end up making $60 million for the fight while Wilder $40 million. These two have not achieved these pay days anywhere before outside the potential AJ fight. Why will these two mind fighting against each other?
Shelley Finkel already said there is no paperwork and he expects this to be the end. Even a weird decision won't bring these two together again IMO. This is it.
I don't care if it's a TD because of a cut, a freak injury, a DQ.. anything They just need to move on, even if Wilder wins they need to go their separate ways, we've seen enough.
To be honest, I don't buy into this he's a broken man, is only taking the fight for the money, and doesn't actually believe he can win argument. I know what motivates him and his repulsive YT cultists and how devastating it was to both him and them for him to lose to Fury and he's stupid and delusional beyond words and I don't doubt for a second that he genuinely believes he's going to win.
You need to work on your reading comprehension. No one said Wilder had the best win/loss record, but his opposition has been the strongest since 2018. I posted above I dislike the absence of variety, so I agree with you there. And prior to 2018 Joshua easily has the better resume, but the discussion here is since 2018. But let's look: Champion Champion Champion (was Fury considered Champion in the first fight? i don't know, but certainly top 3) No. 5 No. 5 No. 8 (and I wasn't even counting him) vs No. 1 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 10 Unranked (Ruiz 1) Based on your own numbers, Wilder obviously has had the more difficult fights since 2018.
Sure, but if he believes all that nonsense then he believes he's been robbed twice and probably that he will be again - why would a man in such circumstances be anything other than broken?