If Wlad ads another notch to his belt against Chambers, will it help his legacy?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Mar 20, 2010.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    :lol:

    Yeah, i made a thread about that one:

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6368197#post6368197


    I think he may have rattled Wlad a little bit, but he didn't stop Wlad from clinching in the rounds after, although there were few clinches.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007
    I mean...come on? You're surely not being serious? You're telling me i "know **** about the actual machinations of the sport"? When you've actually said on this forum that "it doesn't matter where your lead leg is, it has done it's job. You load the lead and transfer to the rear."

    That's just made up. Sugar DID NOT tell you that the plcement of the left foot in the left hook didn't matter. That didn't happen. "it doesn't matter where the lead leg is, it has done it's job" is incorrect and shows that you do't understand the machinations of the sport, and it is becoming more embarrassing with every post you make.

    "Plant your left foot on the floor. Anchor it. That's driving the punch...keep that left foot planted." - Joe Frazier

    "Your power comes from your feet...your left foot is planted. There is no pivot." - Bernard Hopkins.


    There is no pivot, never mind flapping it about like a fishes gill :lol: But i guess these guys know ****, huh? Somewhere it should say "the entire load is transfered to your rear leg, so the front leg doesn't matter". For some reason these boys stress specifically the placement of the left leg in the left hook. But Seamus knows best :good

    Now, a pivot, in my opinion is entirely reasonable. I would say it's a reasonable fucntion of the punch and most guys i know use one. But you're the only person i've ever spoken to that thinks the position of the left foot doesn't matter.


    Guys like Trinidad did throw the left hook almost entirely through the right leg, and Joe Louis seems to have believed in it aswell, but you're never, ever going to hear either one tell you that the left foot doesn't matter, or that the left foot in the air is fine. That's just nonsense.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    McGrain,

    Dont you think the power can be generated through the left foot drive and pivot but that on moment of impact the foot may lose contact with the ground ?

    I think rekcutnevets has pointed this out.
    And I provided the example of a shot-putters power.
    And just watching the great left hookers shows this.

    Especially when they are moving forward dynamically. The power being generated is immense, and can clearly be seen originating in the lower body, but that on the precise moment of impact the left foot has left the ground. The left foot leaving the ground actually seems to indicate a strong drive and pivot that came a moment prior.
    David Tua did it almost every time he threw the hook, and I dont think he was neglecting lower-body power in his left hook, or throwing an "arm punch". I think he had the punch down.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007

    I don't just think it, it's definitely the case. It's not a quesiton of what you "can" or "can't" do, rather a question of what is perfect.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is instrcutive. Check out 11 seconds:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCDh7I0ABpk[/ame]

    This is the best Tua hook in this compilation in my opinion. Tua DOES lift his left foot off the canvas, but look very carefully. He does it after the punch has landed. It is a function of following through with the hook with the torque generated in the lower body which is a common trait of the punch when thrown very hard. Frazier talks about it - "go ahead and make an adjustment to your balance after you have thrown if you have to". But it's the right way around. Lifting the left foot off the floor AFTER the hook has landed is a world apart from the lifting the foot of the floor BEFORE it lands.

    In the double hook immediatly afterwards, he has his left foot planted firmly to the canvas throughout the motion of the hook, but his right foot is lifted from the canvas slightly.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, and what is perfect is almost certainly beyond our scope of knowledge on the subject.
    The biomechanics and physics behind the perfect left hook is a complicated area that has probably not been studied by qualified experts.

    All we can talk about our decent layman's knowledge. Putting the "whole body behind it", "the hips into it", "using the legs", throwing it "from the toes up" ...... I think we can roughly judge those things.
    And I've observed that sometimes those punches feature an impact occuring with the left foot leaving the canvas. That may in fact be perfect for all we know.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well i'd consider the fighters that spend their lives throwing these punches "qualified experts".
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    It's not clear to me, even in slow-motion, where the exact moment impact occurs. Try as I might I have trouble pausing in at the exact moment of impact.

    That seems reasonably. That's what I've been thinking all along.

    But you quote Frazier as saying "after you have thrown it", not landed it.

    You dont know if those are more perfect than one landed with the foot just off the canvas. Other than your pre-supposed views on the matter.

    This is more complicated than just assuming one thing you've read is correct and sticking to it. I stress that i dont know the answers. This is a field of biomechanics that I think takes more than a few quotes from boxers and a discussion among ourselves to find real knowledge on.

    Earlier in the thread I thought you were taking the extreme line of saying any left hook landed with the left foot not in contact with the ground is purely using upper-body generated force and nothing from the legs. To me, that's just wrong.
     
  9. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,630
    1,901
    Dec 2, 2006
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007
    The noise helps; but if you look to Tua's foot and at the same time the movement in the head of the victim, it becomes clearer, or it did to me.


    That's true, but it's in the section which describes following through, so it's pretty clear that it is after the punch has landed. The full quote: "When you turn the punch over, simultaneously bring your left hip round but keep that left foot planted. Follow through with the punch. If you have to to move a little to stay on balance, do it." That's the original quote,I was paraphrasing, which, yeah, wasn't wise given the kind of detail we are talking about.



    Well it's how I was taught and how every single account of the hook i've read describes it. The reason that the left hook hasn't evolved to become a one-legged punch is that it is less effective that way. Watch the double hook Tua throws in the above link and try to imagine it without his planting the left leg. It's impossible.

    It's also true that following through with the punch properly is dependant upon balance. I just can't imagine a situation where the left hook would be as affective throw one-legged. I don't know it's the case in the existential sense that I don't know anything but i'm about as confident on it as it is possible to be.

    I think that the legs were resopnsible for generating momentum, actually, and said so, but yeah, i basically don't see how the left leg can affect the torque of a given punch in any meaningful way if it isn't planted. I'm not a biomechanic, but that seems obvious to me.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007


    This content is protected
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    But in all these cases, including Wladimir, the leg is planted at the initial phase of the punch (when power is generated).
    It's not as if anyone's hopping around on one leg throwing hooks.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007

    And that was the funtion of Wlad's forward momentum and the mode by which he closed the ditance to allow the hook to be landed. But the reason that Frazier so completely stress the left leg be planted throughout is so the transfer of the power from the leg to the fist is possible.

    Either way the idea that the left leg "doesn't matter" in terms of the point of the delivery of the hook is entirely new to me and I would have to believe, nonsense, for the reasons both Joe and Bernard Hopkins indicate.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Wow all this mileage out of a slappy left hook :lol:
    This content is protected
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,309
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:

    Honestly, I wish I had never opened my mouth.

    "Slappy" is a bit strong though ;)