If Wlad beats Haye he's an ATG

It hasn't happened yet. Deal with the ratings as they ARE.

Now stop dodging my question.

Sorry but we can't move on to your question until you first answer mine...

 

I knew it. you aren't a knowledgeable poster are you. This 1/2 vs 1/2 is something you heard someone once say and now you repeat it without looking further into the sport.

As i said I held this opinion once and decided to trace a complete lineage through using just this rule and there's no starting point because of the colour line. so then i decided to do it just from the first recognised champs but then using this rule and it doesn't work, it re-writes history.





As to your question that i've answered now already 3 times, i'll go for attempt number 4 in detail:

the rankings from last month were from before the alvarez-rhodes fight. So had the fight between cotto and cintron happened before the alvarez-rhodes fight then yes i'd recognise it considering noone lese in the divison has done anything. Cotto has beaten foreman and mayorga, cintron has beaten angulo and had a close fight with williams until the injury. dzindzuruk, williams had left the division and bundrage only had a victory over corey spinks. angulo was approaching a years inactivity and alvarez had not yet fought at the limit.

So at that time, yes ofcourse i'd have recognised the winner as champ because the division is that weak, noone else is worth anything.

however since the rankings update, bundrage has beaten powell by a clear UD and Alvarez has stopped rhodes in the twelth. These two are almost certainly going to move above cintron in the rankings. we won't know this until the next issue which comes out on the 14th July. So i'll read the new updated rankings and see who the new top 3 guys are but I'd expect the top 5 to look like

cotto
alvarez
dzindzuruk
bundrage
cintron

which means that cotto-cintron, unless it gets fought in a time machine sometime last month, would not be for the vacant ring belt.





Now unless you address any of my points I'm going to assume you are a boy who does not really follow boxing and has such a shallow knowledge that they repeat this 1/2 vs 1/2 bull**** because someon told it you before.

I will use my power of foresight and assume you will dodge all my questions because you do have a shallow knowledge and as such I hope you have a good day sir.

Any further questions you have can be answered throughout my series of posts, I no longer take you seriously as your argument is not overtly credible and you have been very poor in expressing your opinion.

:hi::hi::hi:

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

The Alvarez Rhodes fight is irrelevant to the question on the table...

 

have a good day troll :hi:

 

:happy:happy:happy

 

Those must be some damn good drugs you're using...

 

At Nay Sayer getting took apart by Lufcrazy.

 

That was entertaining.