If Wlad linear champion now?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Jul 18, 2009.


  1. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
  2. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
  3. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,268
    1,308
    Jun 18, 2008
    after beating ibragimov and chagaev, i would say yes, but he can't be the lineal champion, as long vitali is not retired.
     
  4. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    He is as linear a champ as we are gona get.
     
  5. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Lineal title is sort of consensus ... not same as ring title which is nominated.

    So was Chagaev (guy who did not fought in almost 2 years, had no belt
    and who was ruled out recently from title fight) the proper opponent
    for gaining the lineal title?
     
  6. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    No. Lennox Lewis is the linear/lineal champion.
    Wlad can't be considered lineal until the titles are unified imo.
     
  7. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    No.

    In my view the titles need to be unified to crown a new linear champion.

    Some people consider that a lineal vacancy can be resolved by the number one and two fighters in the division meeting. It's still a tough argument to make that Chagaev was number two before the fight though.
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    i wont mind if we share the lineage with his brother
     
  9. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
  10. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
  11. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Prety much.
     
  12. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    No he isn't you nuthugging fool.

    There is no debate here, he has not beaten the linear champion in Lewis, and so has to forge his own lineage by becoming undisputed champion.

    End of story.
     
  13. JohnAkiBoa

    JohnAkiBoa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,582
    0
    Mar 27, 2009
    Linear does NOT mean a **** if Wlad takes all the major belts and he still is not recognized one...:deal
     
  14. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    And so when they both lose, we will have 2 lines of lineage, 2 fighters in the division calling themselves linear.

    ****ing great idea.

    :patsch
     
  15. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    The tradition on lineage is #1 vs #2 to re-establish. I don't think unifying belts has anything to do with it. Of course, 1/2 rankings could be debated, but right now they are pretty clear. Given that they won't fight, I don't think he's lineal.

    That said, making the Iggy and Chag fights happen deserve credit. He's clearly the #1 guy, but by my understanding of lineage, not linear.