If Wlad was 3 or 4 inches shorter, he would be a crap boxer!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by s23041983, Mar 20, 2010.


  1. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    anyone agree?......disagree? :think
     
  2. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    of course, that's his only advantage - his size, height, and reach. Otherwise he's a robotic 1 - 2 puncher. It's too bad there are no good HW's out there to expose him.
     
  3. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    Well, he defo wouldn't be as good as he his. Eddie did do a good job of letting his hands go at times and you could see he was thinking as to how the **** he hits him. Eddie showed some great skills, and if Wlad was 3 or 4 inches shorter he would have gotten beat and he would be thrown into the mix of all these HW's that are B fighters right now. If anything that would be better for the division if that was the case. Instead of two big, tall, skillful Heavyweights that aren't exciting dominating everybody they fight.

    I had a friend of mine say "Why isn't Chambers attacking him and going straight ahead? If that was Marciano he would have KO'd Klitschko in 2 rounds."

    Then I replied, "Yep you are right...about the fact that it would be over in 2 rounds. Marciano wouldn't have had a chance and he would get killed."

    Round 12 comes and Chambers gets KTFO. I told him that's exactly what would happen to a 190 pound Rocky Marciano. Except it would be a lot sooner.
     
  4. groom

    groom Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Feb 19, 2010
    but he isn't so live with it
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,141
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    If Roy Jones was never lightning-fast he would have been **** too! :!:
     
  6. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    If my aunt had balls she would be my uncle.
     
  7. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    fast track david price and get him in with wlad :deal
     
  8. T.S.

    T.S. T.Stout Full Member

    5,959
    114
    Jul 23, 2004
    If Shaq O'Neil was shorter he'd be a **** basketball player. But he isn't so he's a great one.
     
  9. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Would the same thing apply to Lennox Lewis? His size advatage & reach was a major asset and fought in the same type of style as Wladimir.

    What if Floyd Mayweather was slow? **** off.
     
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    2 words...David Tua...
     
  11. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    ok groom I will :huh
     
  12. Spud565

    Spud565 Active Member Full Member

    594
    0
    Sep 19, 2008
    He'd be like Kessler. Good against stand up fighters. Show him angles, athletism and unorthodoxy and he would collapse.
    Chambers was finding the angles, just was too little to unload.
     
  13. Scratch

    Scratch Active Member Full Member

    657
    106
    Sep 8, 2007
    His fundamentals, balance, handspeed, power and footwork aren't bad at all.

    His major problems are a poor chin and a fanbase consisting exclusively of mongs.
     
  14. Scratch

    Scratch Active Member Full Member

    657
    106
    Sep 8, 2007
    That's a fair point.
     
  15. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Lennox would be a good fighter regardless of his height and size. He had good boxing skills. Same with Mayweather. Without his speed he'd still be good.

    Wlad & Vitali have elementary boxing skills and they get away with it because of their size and the fact that the division sucks balls.