If Wlad was 3 or 4 inches shorter, he would be a crap boxer!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by s23041983, Mar 20, 2010.


  1. trainer

    trainer Active Member Full Member

    544
    8
    Mar 13, 2010
    :good Brilliant first post.

    All the Klitschko haters always have the conditions "if" or "but"
     
  2. PFG

    PFG Active Member Full Member

    1,400
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Height can be a hindrance. Quite a big one.

    In the end, boxing is about using the tools you have to best efficiency on the ring. If Wlad was smaller, he'd probably be a lot more mobile too. You can't really say what might have happened... What you can say is what you see, what is happening right now and right now... Wlad will make short work of any competition he's presented.
     
  3. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    why are u all being pricks about it?

    Im basically having a pop at wlads boxing skills so just chill a bit with the insults and stupid answers.

    and before you say, i didnt ask a stupid question to begin with.... we all know how these forums work. someone says 'I agree. he has no skills'' and someone counters with ''i disagree, he is good at such and such....'' and before we know it, we have a good ole natter about boxing....


    But... certain wankers do have to come on and start telling everyone to **** off and putting people down.


    so before u click on the thread next time, think about ity... nobody in here wants to hear you mouthing off!!! :drama
     
  4. Fan88

    Fan88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,823
    1
    May 3, 2009
    If so, why does Valuev suck and why is Tony Thompson a 6'5 southpaw not holding any belts?
     
  5. groom

    groom Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Feb 19, 2010
    thx:-(
     
  6. Scratch

    Scratch Active Member Full Member

    657
    106
    Sep 8, 2007
    Valuev has no power, mobility, jab...or anything else really.

    And he still got to be a beltholder like Wlad.
     
  7. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Let's entertain this thought. IF Klitschko were 3 or 4 inches shorter, would he in turn be dumber as well? Would he have ever become a professional boxer in the first place? If he did, would he even be a heavyweight? Would he not understand that he is 6'2" or 6'3" and not 6'7", therefore fighting like a shorter fighter (shorter than 6'7" anyway) rather than a taller one? Should he fight on his knees next time around or should he continue to use his height to his advantage?
     
  8. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    BUT THATS A SKILL. if roy jones was taller or shorter, he still would have been great.
     
  9. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    It don't ****ing matter. Vladimir isn't going to get any shorter.

    Size can help only so much without a high skill level to back it up we have seen guys like Michael Grant, Awkinwande, Valuev, etc.
     
  10. PFG

    PFG Active Member Full Member

    1,400
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Stupid thing to say, dumbo. Lennox especially when he was young, had many technical flaws. It's only when Mannuel Steward took over that Lennox became a great boxer.
    And how is that? By utilizing your height to the best of your advantage. In fact, heck, Lewis was flawed to a much greater level than either Klitschkos before getting supreme training.

    Wlad is the white Lennox in almost every way appart from chin. Lewis had a better chin.
     
  11. Aint no stoppin

    Aint no stoppin Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,191
    937
    Dec 15, 2008
    i wont take anything away from wlads win tonight but you have to agree!
    If chambers and klit would be the same size!? chambers would land those crisp sharp counter punches all night on wlad
     
  12. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Fantastic!!! we finally have a conversation about boxing...

    I think hes only in the ring because of his size. I dont think he would have been a pro boxer if he wasnt so big, unlike his brother, whom i rate very highly as a boxer.
     
  13. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    A paper belt holder. That most thought was a robbery in the 1st ruiz fight.But also Chris Byrd was a title holder, and he was small and chubby.

    Chambers just dominated the 6'7 Dimitrenko don't forget that.
     
  14. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    this is what i mean? :deal :good
     
  15. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    His style is based around his height and reach.