If Wlad was 3 or 4 inches shorter, he would be a crap boxer!!!

I would say try to make sure he is as old as possible before you make him your next opponent. For now, each fighters' gameplan seems to go right out the door as soon as that first bell rings before quickly realizing that their training and sparring was nowhere near sufficient enough to prepare them for what is in front of them. So, while I don't readily have that gameplan on hand right now, I would venture to say that there should be a plan B, C, D, E, F and G. Of course the gameplan is different for each of Wladimir's opponents, but more important than the gameplan itself would be the execution of it. One more thing to be sure, it will take a smart fighter, on top of a physically gifted one, since Wladimir himself is both (and not subtlely either).

 

Floyd Mayweather thrives on his speed. Slow him down to average and he can't do all of his tricks anymore, making him an average fighter. Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

 

If you were smarter, you wouldn't be a ******.

 

lmao like all in the same minute.

 

We're being ****y because you're being ****ier, mate. This whole thread is ridiculously ****y. You started the ****yness.

 

If weightlifters werent strong they would be ****. If basketball players were short they would be ****. If sprinters were fat they would be ****. If a HW boxer isnt big and strong they probably will be ****, ****ing idiot. Physical attributes are very important in every sport.

 

You dislike the guy because he is a tall fighter who fights tall? That's not right. And your reasoning for choosing to dislike him is based on something that you don't even know, but are only speculating on. His skills are NOT average. They are tremendous. Even more so considering how athletic he is for such a big man. Are you suggesting that his skills would diminish if his height did? If he were smaller, who's to say he wouldn't be quicker? Or lighter on his feet? Or that he wouldn't have developed an inside game during his career? I'm not trying to tell you who to like or dislike, just questioning the reasoning behind it, since you were so kind to share with the rest of us. Anyway, if Klitschko was shorter, what makes you think he would still be a heavyweight anyway?

 

He would likely have to afapt a totally new style. You see, that style works for him because he is so tall. If Wlad had the style of Tyson he would get KO'd. On the other hand, if Tyson fought safety first he would lose as well. Wlad's execution of his style and use of advantages is simply great.

 

The largest morons are those who are careless with calling other people morons. Speed is largely genetic, actually. Look it up, the ratio of fast twitch and slow twitch muscle fibers.

 

This guy is completely ludicrous. If power and speed are due to practice then there would be innumerable Mike Tysons and Floyd Mayweathers and Manny Pacquiaos. Not to mention there would be numerous Usain Bolts (asian and white ones too).

 

I feel justified in calling you a moron. I do not feel that I am being careless in my usage. I feel that you are truly a moron. Good day.

 

If Wlad was shorter, he would fight with a much different style. There is no denying his natural born power and athleticism. He would be a great fighter at 6-1, just with a different style. Size begets certain advantages which one would be a fool not to use.