If Wladimir Klitschko goes undefeated for 2 more years..

Dude, he was AWFUL against Haye. Haye didn't come to fight and Wlad obliged. That fight set heavyweight boxing back 30 years. They both stunk up the joint.

Sanders ring a bell???


Keith

 

there's a lot of things that you forgot; and apparently your mother who's also your sister forgot to remind you to take your pills

This content is protected

:deal

 

:good

 

Have you learned how to spell INBRED??


Do you find it depressing that a person you consider INBRED has twice your intellect??

I notice you can't ever refute anything I post, just the same old made up persona attacks, which couldn't be further from the truth.


So where does your inferiority complex come from?

Just curious...


Keith

 

KlitschkoooooooooooooooooooOOOOOoOOOOooOOOOOO!!!!!!!

 

you mean just like on the previous page when i called your bull**** on klit never avenging his loses, when you conveniently avoided to reply back on that, and went on tangents with regards to my misspelling of a word?

I generally stopped doing that as soon as realized how much of a ignorant ****** you are, so i just started making fun of you...

Trying to educate thick rednecks like you would cost me more time then teaching my dog new tricks

"Schooling", i guess you don't even know the meaning of that word,
how could you "school" someone when you can't even get your facts right? you ****ing mo mo

and stop sending me PM you INBREED ******, no i won't let you suck my dick

 

Keith is a hater of the highest order, who'll never give credit to the Klitschkos no matter what, reason and logic are useless against him.

 

I think he will pass Ali, and maybe Holmes.

 

he can't face the number because the number 2 has taken himself out of the running. every time the number 3 has called wlad out, he's dominated them.

same way jones didn't face the number 2 because the number 2 refused to travel. every time the number 3 called jones out, he dominated them.

and no, the wba stripped dm for having a picture taken showing their belt alongside the lightly regarded wbo belt.

either way, my point is clear.

lineage is not relevant today, what is is someone being the number 1 and fighting the best available opponents. this is something both jones and wlad did despite neither of them fighting the number 2 ranked guy for the duration of their time at the top.

 

That's the reason isn't it? Jones said america and dm said germany?

I'm not overly bothered anyways, i'm just making a point that sometimes the number 1 and number 2 don't fight.

Another is dempsey and wills. Between 19 and 23 they never fought.

 

You can't count Wlad's WBO defences as he wasn't number 1 at the time that was Lewis / Rahman.
It's difficult to compare with the guys who fought for one title but I think the comparison should be done from the point he became the number 1 titlist rather than when a new lineage starts as it's a lot more difficult to start lineage now.

He has 10 defences since becoming number 1 against Byrd.

 

Couldn't agree more.

 

Yes, if Lennox Lewis's win over McCall, where he just stood and watched as McCall had a drug-withdrawal induced nervous breakdown, counts as him "avenging" being knocked out by Crybaby McCall, then Wlad's beating up of Brewster should count for the same.

 

u mad bro~?