If you are the massive underdog in a Championship fight...

How dose going with your stringhts give you no chance of wining? I would think going with your stringhts would be your best and only chance to win. If your a heavey underdog than it is very likly that you are one deminsional and your stringhts would be more efective than your weekness.

 

If I were training a boxer to fight a heavey favrote I would advise him to go with his stringhts and hope for the best.
I have thought about what I would do if I found my self in a fight with some one who I knew was better than me. I think I would be more agresive because it is easyer for me to prosess informition if I'm on the atack than it is when I'm defending myself. I also beleve it takes less enengery to move forward than it dose to move backwards.

 

So my style dose not match? I have trubble acapting that it would mean certan defete but for the sake of the arugument if going with my stringhts would mean certan defete I would go fore broke. My ultmite goal is to win and if my stringhts gave me no chance to win they would become weeknesses.

 

I cannot understand the concept of being an underdog mate.

 

Calzaghe is the favorite in that one until he is 40.

 

Why would someone with self respect enter the ring at that age?

 

:rofl

 

Archie Moore had a bit of respect. And Big George solidified his place in history in his forties. Jack Johnson fought at 60. True fighters can do it in old age. Smart fighters do enough when they're young.

 

Joe at age 40 would be overrated.