If you criticize Tunney for not facing any BIG heavyweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sonny's jab, Dec 19, 2007.


  1. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    ..... Do you apply the same standard to Marciano ?

    I mean, I often read statements that Tunney is unproven against proper big heavies (ie. Rougly 210+ or 6'2+ types), the statements seem fair.

    But Marciano faced few quality big men of that size.
    Joe Louis was perhaps the only one who was a real contender, but he's not anything like the vintage Joe Louis.
    Walcott was strong as hell but only 6' and 197.
    Rex Layne is listed as weighing in the 190s.

    Rocky beat a few third-raters who were big, but does that really prove anything that we should not presume about Tunney ?
    Call me crazy, but I think's it's fair to presume that Tunney beats Johnny Shkor, Big Bill Wilson and Keene Simmons, for example.

    Tunney beat a fair few 180-200 pounders, good fighters among them, including Dempsey twice.

    When it comes to size of opposition, does Tunney really lag far behind Marciano, or Johnson and Jeffries for example ?

    BTW, I'm not obssessed with size, just trying to figure out the reasoning behind various rankings.
     
  2. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Marciano had no trouble stopping 215lbs Joe Louis. While he was past his prime, he was still a big contender beating other contenders. Tunney has no such win.
    On top of that, Marciano was extremely dominant, faced everyone and knocked everyone out. Tunney only faced a handful of heavyweights.

    Another interesting, overlooked question is: Do you criticize Sonny Liston for not facing any BIG heavyweights? The only decent big heavy he fought was Williams, he only managed to beat one contender during his entire career. Liston often escapes this criticism because people have the idea of a big ugly bear being a 6'6 240lbs guy while he was only as big as Chris Byrd, who is widely seen as undersized today.
     
  3. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    Fair enough, you put a lot of stock in KOing an old Joe Louis against have NO SUCH WIN.
    That makes sense.

    I'm not sure exactly how many 180-200+ pounders Tunney faced, but I guess MOST of Marciano's 49 wins were against that size of opponent. So another valid point.

    I think Liston was bigger than Byrd, at least I reckon you should accept his superiority in strength and power even if I cant prove he had more lean mass.

    Holyfield, Tyson, Holmes, Ali, and Foreman (1969-73) all weighed around the same mark as Liston. (Or Byrd)
    It's safe to presume he's big enough to compete against anyone.
    The best fighters Liston faced ranged from around 190-212.
    But he made mincemeat of a few bigger second-raters.

    I think Liston gets credit for being mean, skilful and powerful rather than some confusion over how big he is.

    And the flipside, I dont think Chris Byrd is considered lacking simply by account of his 215 pounds and 6' height. It's more to do with the fact that he's a pitty-pat creampuff puncher, who flaps and slaps his way through matches.
     
  4. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004

    MARCIANO BEAT BIG MEN LOUIS AND LAYNE but you also got to remember that most of the Big men of that time were cut down by Charles,Walcott and Moore and Lastarza before they got to be top 5 , contenders, Bob Baker,Nino Valdes were beaten by Moore and Lastarza beat 6'2 1/2 Dan Bucceroni and Charles beat Billy Gillian who was 6"2 and he also beat Layne and 6"3 Coley Wallace. I think the point is Marciano beat the BEST men of his time, they Best who beat the Bigger men and when Rocky did fight bigger men like Layne and Louis, he scored devastating KO's. In fact some of the Bigger men Cleveland Big Cat Williams 6'3,Bob Baker 6'2 were KO'd by by 174lb Bob Satterfield who also dropped and dominated Valdez 6"3 (who would have been victom # 50 if He had won) and Satterfield was KO'd IN 2 by Charles. So if you look at the record clearly it was the more skilled guys who scored impressive wins over the big men. Hurricane Jackson was a 6"3 contender but he was KO'd by Valdez who lost to Moore and Satterfield and Jackson also lost to light heavy Jimmy Slade who lost to Moore, Bucceroni and Harold Johnson. I think this era of the mid 50's and before had a freakish bunch of small sized but superior Heavyweights, Marciano, Walcott, Charles,Moore,Lastarza,Satterfield who could compete and wipe out a lot of the big guys in any era
     
  5. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    Tunney's resume is the least discussed in boxing I would say
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    I agree with this. Sonnys jab marciano holds a win over a # 1 contender who weighed 215lb. despite being past his prime, this win over louis could be very equivalent to if say tunney had taken on george godfrey and beat him, but he ducked godfrey. I Beleve Old louis was actually better than firpo, morris, and old willard. so the quality of that win counts for more than some of dempseys top big opponents.




    sonnys jab, why do you single out marciano when hes fought 8 men over 200lb, 5 men over 215lb while james jeffries never fought one man over 200lb.





    pontius, liston also knocked out 6'3 214lb Nino Valdez who earlier in the year was ranked # 2 and had knocked out 3 contenders.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I would consider even a 34 year old 6'3 212lb nino valdez decent, especially if the year before he was flattening top contenders like harold carter, wayne bethea, mike dejohn. Power is the last thing to leave a fighter, and valdez still had plenty of it not to mention a ramroid for a jab. he was dangerous.



    liston beat alot of other men over 200lb. henry clark, gerad zhech, chuck wepner, wayne bethea, amos lincoln.......and many more
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,120
    25,289
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah, of Liston's 55 pro fights or whatever it was, I counted roughly 28 men who were under 200Lbs, and quite a few more who just barely made that weight. Liston can't be credited for fighting monsters per say.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Fact Remains outside of a very fat tom heeney, tunney did not take on one man over 200lb. we can speculate what he would have done to 3rd teir big heavyweights, but we dont know. he certainly never proved he could take on a big man calibre of george godfrey
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005


    Liston fought 24 men who weighed over 200lb. this is impressive considering his era. He also beat two of the most dangerous big skilled fighters of his era nino valdez and cleveland williams.
     
  11. joe33

    joe33 Guest

    Oh god who really cares,he won all his fights,beat everybody about who was worth a damn,and no amount of talking and bullshitting is gonna change this simple fact = 49-0 simple as that really,get over it maybe
     
  12. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Chris byrd cannot be compared with liston really,he continually ATE his way up and used weights to maintain that unnatural weight,He claimed it was hard work to keep his weight up.
    Men like liston,tyson and co were genuine solid 210/217 guys,byrd was a blown up boxer,who could have fought many divisions below heavy,tyson and liston could never have fought below heavy. (well,maybe for their first few years as toddlers.)
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Only in your mind. Byrd said he left training camp at 203lbs and then bulked, not ate, himself up to 212lbs.

    Take a look at these photos, you will find that Byrd does not carry excess fat or anything (you can see his abs), he looks like a normal big 210 pound guy. Compare it to Liston, they're very similar:

    This content is protected




    This content is protected




    This content is protected





    This content is protected




    This content is protected
     
  14. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    Wow! I never knew Tunney was that good.
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I have a ring magazine article shortly before bryd-holyfield where bryd states "I naturally weigh 195lb, I have to eat myself up to 210lb."


    Sonny Liston is naturally much bigger than chris bryd, and if you compare their measurements, liston takes the cake by a mile.




    Chris,


    believe it or not, I think liston was in much better shape pre 1962 than he was in that picture where he was old, overweight, and out of shape vs ali.


    heres liston vs dejohn 1959

    This content is protected