If you have Ray Robinson as P4P number 1 please explain....

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Dec 27, 2009.


  1. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    why he is more deserving and ranked higher than Henry Amrstrong.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Because prime for prime he'd comprehensively beat Armstrong at any weight from 135-147 and is a more complete fighter and better boxer. People of the time were more impressed with Robinson than Armstrong
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,122
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have them very close. I think the reason Robinson gets the nod is he looks better to most people on film. He's got great dimensions, too. I have no problem which way round people rank them.
     
  4. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    I don't have him #1, I have him #3 just ahead of Armstrong in 4.

    The premise for ranking him there is that I far he's more complete fighter. That's about it. I have no qualms with Armstrong anywhere from 1-4 though.
     
  5. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    I see it as a matter of longevity verses intensity. Robinson began his career with very impressive wins... Angott. Servo. Zivic. He also was extraordinarily competetive a quarter century later.

    Armstrong's whirlwind campaign that got him those three titles is an accomplishment that I'm not so sure ANYONE can top.

    Robinson's longevity was something that kept him talked about for a long time. Ali's emphasis on him in the early/mid sixties also served as a reminder. Armstrong was quite literarlly a storm that wreaked havoc and then weakened. But all such storms are brief.

    Still great was Hank, but the losses to Ambers and Zivic were surprising at the time, and have unfortunately knocked him down a notch in the eyes of some observers. Ambers and Zivic were both great fighters who would probably school many modern greats in the news today. Serious guys, those two... Zivic on his good days would change your life with the kind of beatings he dished out.

    Meanwhile, Robinson was clever enough to avoid certain fighters that we know would have caused him real problems.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Armstrong could have fought Burley, Holman Williams and Cocoa Kid himself
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,122
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007

    I'd consider Armstrong's duck of Burley more disturbing than Robinson's. Having said that, Burley was never the #1 contender and was out with an injury when Armstrong matched Zivic, which was really when he needed that momentum. Not that he would have got the fight, Zivic was the draw, even if he could easily have gone 0-3 with Charley.
     
  8. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    The only thing Armstrong has on Robinson is the 3 weight thing but he also has that on every other fighter in history (holding 3 titles simultaneously, not just winning 3 titles)

    Robinson has a better record, had more tools inside the ring, looked better on film, beat more world champions & seemed more consistent in his younger - prime days.
    Throw in better longevity & the fact that of the 2 main weight classes SRR competed in (WW & MWT), he is consensus no1 at one of those & never outside the top 4 in the other - no1 on a lot of MW lists, in fact he won the official poll for both classes...... I really think Robinson, everything considered, should be ranked over Henry.

    Robinson was the greatest p4p fighter that ever lived.... oh yes, its true.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,169
    13,161
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah? I've never heard anything about that. Could you elaborate? Sounds interesting.

    The reason to have Robinson ahead is mainly because of he was so extremely good for such a long time. He hardly have any losses to opponents he had no business losing to, which is extremely impressive considering how many fights he had and how long he was active. He was well managed, though.

    He was also fantastically complete, hardly had any weaknesses to exploit.
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    thanks lads just wanted to play devils advocate i have Robinson number 1.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,122
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007

    Stonie actually touched upon it in his recent article on Burley.

    The story goes that Burley's people (Burley was at that time ranked in the top 5 if memory serves) were onto Armstrong's people and Armstrong's people repeatedly assured Burley's people that they were going to step down and defend the lightweight title, before organising a title defence. Famously, Armstrong then matched Zivic, also form Pittsburgh and a fighter that Burley had dominated...and Zivic lifted the title.

    The counter-argument is that Burley was never the #1 contender, and Armstrong had no reason to meet him. Of course Armstrong isn't beating Burley.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    You also have to remember Robinson was robbed of the chance to become LW champ when his fight with Angott was set over the LW limit. He was also unable to get his WW shot for ages

    Could Robinson have held 2 titles simultanously? Angott he beat, Cochrane he'd beat emphatically, the only question mark is if a 145b Robinson could beat Zale the same way he managed against Lamotta

    Robinson did beat very good lightweight, welterweight and middleweight champions (past/future) in the space of 15months, in the shape of Angott/Zivic/Lamotta
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    To be fair to Hank, his rematch loss to Ambers was quite controversial, and he'd just beaten him earlier that year. The losses to Zivic had a lot more to do with what a dirty ******* Zivic was than Hank being unable to rise to the occasion. What other way could you stop him but dig your thumbs into his eyes until he went damn near blind? That's another reason I think Saddler is a bad matchup for Armstrong, the cheap, dirty tactics he implied.
     
  14. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Armstrong's management wasn't Armstrong. Robinson was essentially his own manager. In other words, I'd give Armstrong the nod in terms of willingness to fight anyone. Robinson less so.
     
  15. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,727
    3,568
    Jul 10, 2005
    I have a hard time ranking Robinson over Greb, Walker and Barney Ross myself.

    Never mind Armstrong.