If you honestly believe pacquiao lost to tim bradley

I don't hate Pacquiao ( "you hate Pacquiao" - thats sound stupid and pointless ). He's a great fighter but you've to admit and be objective and not blindly biased and nostalgic about a fight like this. Bradley was a better boxer than Pac into a competitive fight. Maybe a Hatton Pacquiao would've beat Bradley , whom knows, but the truth is that Pacquiao lost and isn't in his prime. :bart

 

double posting , sorry

 

what does Hearns/Leonard one have to do with anything in the rematch? Fights are scored round by round. If Pacman took his foot off the gas in the second part of the fight, regardless of people thinking he won the rounds or ESPN saying 11-1 which is a little ridiculous, if Manny won them by a small margin or Bradley eeked the rounds out which he apparently did, then Bradley won the fight if he won those close rounds where Manny didn't do as much. I don't think there was corruption, I think the judges honestly have to score it and they scored it round by round and something Bradley did won him enough rounds on two judges scorecards to win the fight. As for Hearns/Leonard 2 there were many close rounds which were scored for Ray so it was deceptive. People look at the whole fight instead of looking at the rounds and totaling them up. Punchstat means nothing when scoring rounds.

 

Just put it this way, no one would be complaining if the judges gave every round to Pac

 

i was at the mirage in vegas last night. after the fight people working at the sports book took my slip, and said your face is a little red, you honeslty feel like you can take this money? i'll give it to you if you can honestly tell me how many rounds you think bradley won. damn ****s!

 

I would. He didnt win all three of the final rounds. But thats about as far as I would go.

 

I'm a crackhead but I thought Pacqiuao won soundly.

Post Box - 1

M8tes theory - 0.