If you read the IBF rules, there is NO controversy. Bute won.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kotjinx, Oct 25, 2008.


  1. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    I agree there is no footage supporting what the ref claimed. By the same token, there is no footage showing that what he said was not true.

    The other claims you're making - are quite possibly true & I don't want to get into them... Ultimately, the big question is: would it have changed the outcome had the referee behaved differently? Would Andrade have won if Bute had been warned for holding and had the ref not intervened? We won't know. So if you believe he would have then the outcome is questionable. I don't.

    The 'controversial' in the title of this thread was really referring to the long count and all that surrounded it. That, I still believe is not controversial and the ref did exactly the right thing.
     
  2. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Ok, so even counting "six" twice was not a mistake... Nice.

    Where do they get these commentators from? It's not like reading five pages of official rules would kill you.... It's your f-in job - you amateurs!
     
  3. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Was he standing after eight or nine seconds. Yes he was. The definiton of being out is pretty clear - check out the initial post. In particular it makes no reference to people having their legs.

    Quote the rules, don't invent new ones. As it stands you're the one putting spin on things.
     
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    The people who claim there was a controversy having not even bothered to read the rules.

    Apparently that is a common occurence here on ESB, whenever a fight is close. Let's not worry too much about what people who don't know the rules and don't understand what they see in front of them think.

    Good job fighting the windmills, by the way.
     
  5. Barber-ian

    Barber-ian Active Member Full Member

    1,234
    1
    May 24, 2008
    Hey, Bazooka. I'm not putting a "spin" on anything. I'm simply relating the actual action of the fight. In fact, I might accuse you of doing a little spin job in that first paragraph:

    "He got up but he fell into the ropes as well, his collar bone, both shoulders and chest area touched the top ropes, he also stumbled afterwards as well on the way back to his corner, he was knocked out."

    1) He was up well before the 10 count.
    2) He may have "touched" the top ropes, but that doesn't matter. The rules state that you must be standing and not held up by the ropes. I don't think you can reasonably claim that the ropes were the only thing keeping him up.
    3) Who cares if he stumbled back to his corner. The fight was over at that point.

    Your next point is that the fighter cannot be saved by the bell. But this has no bearing here. Bute was up before the 10 count, so there was no need for him to have been saved by the bell.

    BTW, it's YOUR contention that Bute wasn't able to go on. But the ref is the person charged with making that call. And with 0 seconds remaining, and with Bute up and standing on his own, the ref made the right call in my opinion.

    Now, one last time. I have no stake in Bute. That fight was literally the first time I ever saw him fight. In fact, I prefer Andrade's style of fighting. He's a tough, come forward fighter who takes a hell of a shot and keeps pressuing throughout the fight. So to be clear: I'm not trying to spin anything in favor of Bute. I simply believe in being rational and clear headed when it comes to situations like this.
     
  6. carias

    carias Active Member Full Member

    1,156
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    You can reasonably claim the ropes held him up. Watch the video. He doesn't lean onto the ropes, he pitches face forward into the ropes. The ropes aren't there, he fall into the first row.
     
  7. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Same here - enjoyed your posts & learnt from reading them. Good stuff :good
     
  8. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    You can argue that. And say we agree with you. How is it relevant?

    The only thing it proves is that the ropes helped him when he was getting up. Last time I checked that wasn't forbidden.

    The relevant point is whether he was standing by the count of eight or nine - and not the style in which he made himself vertical. I believe he was standing and not hanging on the ropes (the latter, according to the rules, is equivalent to being down). Hence he beat the count and the fight was finished legitimately.
     
  9. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    No,it was when the ref was counting,watch the end of the tape during the ref's interview,Andrade was closer to the middle of the ring than the corner.Just watch.And he was taking a step towards the corner where Bute and the ref were.The more I watch it the more I believe nothing was wrong
     
  10. Barber-ian

    Barber-ian Active Member Full Member

    1,234
    1
    May 24, 2008
    He was up and facing the ref before the 10 count. To claim that he wasn't able to continue is subjective opinion. More specifically, it is your opinion. But refs are charged with making that call, not the fans. To be sure, there are some refs who would have called the fight. But there are others, including this one, who would let the fight continue. (with 0 seconds remaining)

    I'm not arguing whether or not the ref made the right call. That's open for debate. But what I am saying is that there is not controversy here.

    BTW, not that this has ANY bearing on the fight, but check out this YouTube video of the 12th round. Someone at the fight took it. Not very high quality, but it does show that Andrade did move to the center of the ring, invoking the ref's admonishments that he return to the neutral corner. So the ref was technically right for yelling at Andrade.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66CO0lksoEo&feature=related

    Of course, this has nothing to do with the outcome. Whether or not the ref stopped to yell, two critical points remain: Bute beat the 10 count and the fight clock expired, meaning he made it through.
     
  11. TomaTos

    TomaTos Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8... UP, than the ref yell at Andrade..., but the fight was over anyway since Bute was up.

    Im mad at the ref, because if he had not yell at Andrade, nobody would have complain.
     
  12. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    It was over at about 4 or 5
     
  13. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    Thanks a lot for posting this - finally some evidence rather than people repeating what they think they saw.

    Andrade was in the middle of the ring when the ref started yelling at him. Anyone knows how big the ring was? We could then roughly compute how far away from the corner he was. 3 - 4 feet - yeah, my ass... :rofl

    Call 100% correct.

    I'm actually starting to be quite impressed with the ref. Seems that pretty much everything he did in the last minute was according to the book.
     
  14. Barber-ian

    Barber-ian Active Member Full Member

    1,234
    1
    May 24, 2008
    Yeah, it's kind of ironic. By following the rules to the letter, the ref has now been vilified by the populist mindset that values their gut feeling over the facts.
     
  15. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    The 'robbery clan' is going to have to shout twice as loud now... Rules against us - fcuk the rules. Evidence against us - fcuk the evidence! Sadly, it seems there's little left for them to fcuk :yep