If you read the IBF rules, there is NO controversy. Bute won.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kotjinx, Oct 25, 2008.


  1. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    I am trying to figure out how a guy who is up at at 9 or 10 and is not capable of fighting back (and hasn't been for at least 40 seconds) cannot be called knocked out? Also does anyone find it interesting that before the Ref starts the count he is continually looking at Bute's corner? He spends a LOT of time looking at Bute's corner while he should be officiating the match and i CANNOT figure out why. Oh that's right, he was full of ****.

    The problem with listing the IBF rules as a defense is that it implies that if the ref didn't "break" any rules that he did his job. Following rules and doing your job objectively are not always the same thing. In fact, the Ref probably acted in a way that he knew the rules would protect, all while not having to his job fairly.
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    A referee administers a count, but that does'nt neccesarily mean that the count is to =10 seconds, in many cases a refs count might be more or less than 10 actual seconds, but what it important is that the falled fighter know that the ref is counting, and where he's at in that count.

    .....and even if a count were to=10 seconds (which I'm 100% certain its not)......your account K is that the ref did everything by the book.
    He certainly did not.....the ref had no idea whether Bute could get up or not, but what he did biasly and dishonestly made certain of, is that he stall it for what its worth and buy Bute as much time as he could.

    Jesus....to stop a count and direct a fighter who's already at the neutral corner to, to go to the neutral corner, when he's already there?:patsch :-(

    You've made some valid point K, but I'd wish for honesty's sake you take back your statement that this ref did everything by the book.
    He certainly did not, the videotape shows all of his bias ridiculous dishonesty to favor Bute, and I am talking about the knockdown and the stalled count that followed it.......
    .....that my friend is far from the book!
     
  3. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    I concur. Screaming seems a lot easier and more popular than reading...
     
  4. C.J.Rock

    C.J.Rock Active Member Full Member

    758
    1
    Nov 16, 2006

    Ive been in and around boxing as a fighter, trainer, boxing writer and above all a boxing fan for over 30 yrs.
    Never in that time have I heard of a fighter having his own personal referee. He allowed Bute to hold like a leech all through the fight, he called a knockdown for Bute when it was an obvious push down, then he gave Bute 23 seconds to recover from a knockdown. If thats not biasedthe Pope isnt catholic
     
  5. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    People don't seem to understand that. Its the obvious ulterior motives that made the situation comical.
     
  6. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,674
    8,133
    Feb 11, 2005
    A few miscellaneous points about some of the arguments in this thread.

    As an aside, I thought the knockdown of Andrade was legit. Bute landed a shot on the top of the head, and the force was sufficient to propel an already off-balance Andrade to the canvas. Kind of like Whitaker's kds of DLH and Haugen. Anytime a fighter goes down on the end of the punch, it's usually going to get called.

    The referee is supposed to pick up the count from the timekeeper. If the timekeeper failed to start the count from the moment Bute touched down, that's on him, and not on the ref.

    And, once again, all Bute had to do from the moment the eight count was completed was to signal his willingness and ability to fight, which was done when he raised his gloves. He then took a (shaky) step forward, and the bell rang. End of fight.
     
  7. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    You either stick to some definitions or you leave it totally to the ref's discretion. I think leaving the ref less discretion is better - less things to talk about, in general.

    I believe that following rules should be equivalent to doing your job well / objectively. If that's not the case then you're implicitly saying the rules are crap. If so, which aspect of the rules would you change?

    As it happens I think the definition of being knocked out - while perhaps not perfect - is pretty good and fairly unambiguous. You need to have your feet on the mat and not hang on the ropes. Again, if you have a better definition, then please share. By the IBF def, Bute was not knocked out / down after 8 or 9 secs.

    As to the ref looking at Andrade, there is a rule there saying that he should check whether he is in the right place. The fact that some other refs might neglect to check it, is no reason for jumping on this one for doing his job properly (at least in this instance).
     
  8. Weber

    Weber Active Member Full Member

    650
    0
    Jun 6, 2007
    Whatever. We saw what we saw; a man barely able to stand on his feet during Andrade's onslaught. Bute clearly lost. **** the rules.
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    :good

    Whats important to remember here is that the ref should have started his count right away, and continued with his count......instead he stalled to begin the count, then without reason stopped the count to admonish Andrade to get back to the neutral corner when he was already there.

    We're in agreement as far as that ref being a total biased joke!
     
  10. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    According to the rules, the count should equal 10 secs (btw. if you don't think it should be 10 secs - then what's all the fuss about - the ref could, according to what you say, take two hours counting to ten and that should be ok, right? ;-)) Of course, since the ref can't be expected to both look at the fighter and check his watch, it sometimes takes a bit longer and sometimes a bit shorter. I agree the fallen fighter should know. But if anything this is only more likely to make him go up, right? So if Bute was up, without a proper count after 9 seconds, then that has to work in his favour. And I think it's as close to a counterfactual as we'll ever get in real life...

    Your argument, if I follow correctly, is that Andrade was in the proper place and that the ref was yelling at him for no reason. If you could direct me to footage showing that, I'd be much obliged. Nothing I've seen so far supports that claim.
     
  11. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    I don't know about the pope (you should never really trust catholics anyway ;-)) but I've never said the ref wasn't biased. I just happen not to agree that he gave Bute the fight. I don't think there would have been a massive outcry if if wasn't for the ending. And I think he did the right thing at the end. And the **** he was pulling during the fight (even if I take what you're saying at face value) did not have a material impact on the final outcome - I think (it was not a difference of a point or two, so who cares if the Andrade knockdown was legit).

    And ultimately, what matters is if the ref changed the outcome of the fight, right? So, in that sense, I've seen a lot worse.
     
  12. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    The fight lasted for 12 rounds and not 1. If you want to **** the rules - why bother with this thread? It's all about rules.

    I love your avatar btw. Is that you?
     
  13. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    It was obvious for most people that the earth is flat. Obviously, it could not have been round, otherwise the people on the other side would have fallen off.

    So, I suggest we stick to the rules ;-)
     
  14. kotjinx

    kotjinx Robotic White Boy Full Member

    616
    0
    Aug 12, 2007
    The first thing you say is simply not true - check out Drew's last post.
    The second thing you say is only true if Andrade was indeed in the corner. I'm still waiting for evidence on that.
    If I was mean, I'd say that this proves that you're a total biased joke... But I'm not - so I'll let this rest ;-)
     
  15. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,097
    Jul 24, 2004
    Did you see the Showtime broadcast?......because thats the broadcast I saw.....

    Showtime in the replays was even able to get a shot of the whole ring as the knockdown occured, and all through the whole count up to when the fight ended.
    The replay shot of the whole ring, shows that Andrade went to the neutral corner as was directed, and it showed that he stayed within 2 or 3 feet of the exact corner where the ropes join.

    Andrade was in the neutral corner the whole time, but this idiot referee decided that because Andrade did'nt have his arms wrapped around the corner ropes, that it would be the excuse to stall for time.

    The video tape clearly shows that Andrade was at the neutral corner the whole time!

    Showtime my friends, I think they replay the fight on wednsday!:deal