"If you retire undefeated it means you didn't fight everyone you were supposed to"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jas, Mar 22, 2014.


  1. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    16,150
    11
    Jan 14, 2011
    Question is vague.

    It's a no from me. Can't speak for everyone. I would rather be the biggest icon of my country than the highest paid athlete in the world.
     
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    If that's what you'd rather be so be it.:lol:
     
  3. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Great fighters don't retire when they are undefeated. Only scared pretend fighters do. They usually retire before they are exposed.

    look at Joe calzaghe who spent 80% of his career padding his resume with bums, then much later faced and defeated a washed out Roy Jones, and barely got a decision against an old Hopkins.
    His undefeated status don't mean squat.
     
  4. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Defend myself from what?

    What? I told you Joe beat the highest ranked SMW instead of fighting Froch. You then claim he should have done more so I point out that Joe beat most of the top SMW around at the time. You are the one changing the argument from Joe should have fought Froch to Joe should have done more in his reign.

    Shot Jones still matches up better against Calzaghe than a green Froch. All you do is pathetically attempt to criticize Calzaghe again and again.