If you think Cotto won AND Calzaghe beat Hopkins...

Wardrobe malfunction.....Now thats a phrase you don't hear often enough!

 

Listen newb, Clottey did nothing to show that he wanted to take Cotto's titles in the last two rounds. Also, Calzaghe threw and landed more versus Hopkins. Other than the first 2 or 3 rounds, Hopkins didn't do anything. Maybe you should find another sport to watch you moron!

 

So by the same logic if you thought Clottey and Hopkins won you're also an idiot, right?

Because that also wouldn't make sense in your blinkers ridden world?

 

i had cotto winning by a point 114-113.....i think he did what he had to in the 12th..with that said he doesn't deserve a fight with pac cuz he didnt perform to a high enough level imo!

 

Who did u lose your avi bet with?
That avi they gave you is awful. how long do u have to sport it?

 

are you an african american?

 

i think based on effective aggression that clottey edged him out 1 point... now hopkins vs calzaghe was a clean effective punching vs a slap fest... don't know how to look at that one so i think both of these fights should just be rematched but we know thats not gonna happen... calzaghe has no balls and cotto dont want no parts of a clottey rematch

 

then feel free to call me an idiot

 

i think cotto wins closed and u are the biggest idiot mother ****er, good day

 

I think Clottey and Calzaghe won.

 

Cotto won, Hopkins won, you lost with this thread.

 

And you are a ***** who dont know **** about boxing. You are a silly fan-boy. Hopkin clearly lost againt Slapzague. And Clottey was not robbed. Get a grip for **** sake, boxing is a sport where every inch is important, every punch, every jab. Clottey can only blame himself that he never finish the work yesterday. FACT

 

This content is protected

 

bone head