If You Was An Elite Boxer, Would You Rather Lose To An ATG Or A B-Level Guy?

B-level guy. Those losses to sub par opposition mostly get written off as an off night or a fluke. Losing to an ATG is a loss in a legacy fight which will have a larger impact on how people view your career.

All in all I'd take losing to B level guys and winning legacy fights as the better pick.

 

PBF is 2-0 against JLC deal with it and log off.

 

Having difficulty getting past "if you was". What is this thread about again?

 

I wouldn't want to lose to Mayweather and be called "one helluva fighter"

 

This thread doesn't make sense at all... if you lose to a b level fighter you lose all your steam. If you lose to an ATG you can still do successful things in the sport

 

idk about this thread. is it a serious question? why would u rather lose to a b fight instead of an elite.

if ur an elite fight there is shame losing to a lesser fighter then you. no shame in your game if you get beat by an elite fighter. you can accept that. but losing to some lesser then you no way i wanna lose to some elite. well let me correct myself i dont wanna lose at all but if i were to lose it be to an elite guy not a b level guy. again is this thread serious. im a nice guy but i wanna be honest this is a stupid question . why would anyone wanna lose to b level oppose to elite fighter ? you can continue ur career n not skip to much of a beat like how canelo lost to floyd n continue . either way if ur elite u can bounce back wit not much steam lost if ur legit elite. but still nowone want to lose to b level fight oppose to elite.