If you was Khan's manager would you have accepted the fight against The Special One?

Pretty much nailed it. If I was Khan's manager no way I would have fought Kell. Both guys could lose in the next 2 years and that fight will still be there and there will be money to be made. No doubt I would have gone after Broner.

 

Yes, you'll call me a brook hater, but I believe Khan can beat him if he doesn't get caught, and Brook's power isn't that proven either. He's not a Keith Thurman by any means. I understand why they would want Brook to build his career up a little bit though, his resume is pretty bad besides Porter.

 

I agree with this too. I pick Brook over Thurman. Thurman over Khan because he will catch him at some point, right? And I think Brook/Khan is a pick'em.

 

What? You'd pick Brook over Thurman? Why??? What are you basing this on? Thurman has a million times more boxing skills than Porter.

 

Yep yep :good

And fighting Chris Algieri is a very good way to make sure you don't lose and ruin a potential Floyd/Pac fight. God I hate boxing sometimes.

 

I disagree. I've watched every one of both man's fights you can find either live (if it was televised) or online (if it's available in reasonable quality). I think Brook is the better boxer and the stronger of the two. Thurman has the clear power edge. But I see Kell controlling him and outpointing him to the tune of 8-4/7-5.

Edit: I thought you said that Thurman has a million times more boxing skills than Brook. Yes, Thurman's certainly a better boxer than Porter. But Kell managed to look good against probably the hardest type of fighter there is to look good against in Porter. Someone who bum rushes you and is ridiculously strong for the division. I think Brook can box with absolutely anyone on the planet and I can't see Thurman doing enough.

 

I see Thurman sparking Brook out, or outboxing him 8-4 lol. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't see what Brook has done to make you think that, but okay :good.

 

Only special people think Kell Brook is special. He's a good fighter, but nothing extraordinary.

 

I know you and Hans disagree a lot, but read the post below the one I am responding too. He's right, Brook's resume isn't all complete nobodies like it's made out to be. I think if it goes to the cards Brook will almost certainly win. If Thurman lets it get to the cards is another question.

 

You rank Senchenko above Porter? The same guy that got stopped by Paulie? That dude was utter garbage, his claim to fame was beating a shot to **** hatton. Jackiewiz was better than Senchenko and is a decent opponent, but better than Porter? Highly disagree there.

Oh, and Canelo was how old when he fought Hatton? Like 19?

 

Sorry, but stopping Senchenko a guy got stopped by Paulie, doesn't say much to me. He also did it after Paulie. Jackiewiz was also pretty old, a decent win, but not a win to brag about by any means. So he has Porter, and Jackiewiz on his resume, who else? He's supposed to be one of the best in the world right?