If you were a boxer...

Same for me man.

 

Pacquiao, Froch, & Wlad

 

i would want have my health to have a lesser risk of damage so i prefer floyd, dirrel and wlad's style but as a man, i would want to be more respected and admired as a warrior that who would do much more to entertain fans so i want to be more well regarded like pac, froch and vitali.

 

Pacquiao
Froch
Wlad - Only because of Hayden. I would love to be a warrior like Vitali, but c'mon, Who would turn that ***** down?

 

pac froch an vitali... because i want to entertain people to make them feel there money it worth watching me. ill assure them that every fight will not be boring..

 

Pacquiao

Froch

Vitali

 

I'd want to be like Lloyd Honeyghan and go over and knock out the best abroad. I'd want no doubt that I beat the best, regardless of what money I earned. I'd least like to be tied into a rubbish contract, fighting for vacant or interim or Wbogus titles, then 5 or six defences at home against bums. I'd rather beat the man then get knocked out in my first defence.

 

So would I have their career?

For example, if I were to pick Wlad, would I viewed as a fighter who's took on the best available - in spite of perhaps the poor state of the division - trying to atleast create a legacy for myself, as opposed to being a fighter who - even with the poor state of the division - fights stiffs and made his name only off a defeat to a past-prime, overweight, unmotivated great?

 

Pac Dirrel Wlad

 

cant have it all lol
Flawless floyd
warrior pac

unless your a prime tyson he never got hit really

 

All 3 of these come down to would you rather be seen as a fearless guy, or a guy who is afraid to be hit.

Obviously, no one wants to be seen as someone afraid to take a punch.

 

Same picks here. :deal