Fighting/beating RJJ at this point in his career proves nothing. I picked Calzaghe, but I also believe fighting/beating a retired fighter that is relatively old and inactive does not prove anything(much).
jones because he has no chin, can't adapt in the ring, and collapses like a lawn chair when faced with adversity. if you lose to jones, theres always a chance he will fail the banned anabolic steroid drug tests afterwards.
As of now...I would pick RJJ. He can't pull the trigger to save his life Prime though I'll stay the **** away from him at all cost
Considering Roy had a good chin in his prime, I'd go with Calzaghe. Both were excellent, but Joe had tough moments, whereas Roy had none. I'd also rather get beat down by Joe Calzaghe than Roy Jones.
Your question translates to "who was more beatable at their peak, Jones or Calzaghe?". And I can't ****ing beleive 8 people think it is Calzaghe. They obviously have no clue what Roy Jones was like.