IF you were Marquez what stipulations would you require to accept a rematch with PAC?

Does the name of Johnco and co rings the bell to you???

What about "a Bigger fish to fry" expression? Does it still valid? Is there any bigger fish to fry out there? Remember when Pac fought David Dias?

 

Tell that to Pac's team.... maybe they will listen to you and forget about Pac-JMM IV, and fight somebody else.... let's say... a bigger fish???

 

every pac fans wants an immediate rematch after the first fight. i would want an immediate rematch also after the 2nd fight but as things have progressed, it is better for pacquiao to do what he did in the business side. he got to figth delahoya and became mainstream.

why would pacquiao fans and even johnco say that pac doesn't need to fight marquez after the first fight when pac wants to fight again as soon as possible while jmm doesn't?

and because of this jmm decision, pacquiao had no choice but to fight morales instead which turned out to be great for his career even if he lost the first fight.

 

Well, that was exactly the question that many had at that time, but Mr Johnco and others were here at that time saying that JMM was a ***** saying that Pac had won the fight and so.... and there was no need for a rematch.... they said the same thing after the second fight as well.

I guess time makes people forget...

 

Is there any bigger fish to fry at the present instead of fighting JMM for the fourth time??? Does it make sense to you if Pac fights JMM for a fourth time???

 

why in the hell would he get punished for winning?

 

55-45 in favor if Marquez, fight st 135, gate, and Arum retired.