if your the best take the test vs if your the best fight the best

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sosolid4u09, Nov 21, 2011.


  1. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Whats more important to a fighters legacy??

    Fighting the best, or taking drug tests.

    The mayweather family seem to have revolutionised how fighters should be ranked. Apparently if your the best you should take drug tests.

    What do you think is more important to a fighters greatness?
     
  2. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    A world championship level fighter is afraid of taking a drug test.

    And nothing there smells fishy to you?
     
  3. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    that is fishy.

    but whats more important in your opinion?

    fighting the best? or taking the test?
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    If I know the man before me is not taking any drugs, then I'd drop all the testing bull****, and fight the best.
     
  5. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    Honesty is important. If Pacquiao is in fact taking steroids his legacy and credibility is shattered. And if one would fight a fighter on steroids, and lose- would he lose to his opponent or the steroids?

    Your thread is really stupid, and its a pointless attack on the Mayweathers. Why wont you go and ***** about Bob Arum who is clearly ducking Mayweather?
     
  6. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    ****ing ******.

    LOOK AT MY SIGNATURE FFS
    its a **** bob arum thread :patsch:patsch