If Zaggers only beat a shot Hopkins then Ward only beat a shot Froch

Super Hans, you got your ass handed to you for the entire first page of your own thread.

Log off.

 

That's right. Only n*ggers would think that Slappy lost. They are the only ones so stupid, right?

Log off you racist idiot.

 

Joe Calzaghe and Brian Nielsen should get together and go bowling.

 

I've already reported you. Super Hitler.

 

Nobody thinks he was shot. Not a single post in this thread below from anyone saying Hopkins was shot just clearly pass his prime. Ignore the poll result those who voted yes only did so to annoy all the Calzaghe nutsack polishers we have on this forum.

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=528537&page=3

Your argument is flawed. You can't define a fighters level of physical ability just by age difference. Otherwise everyone Tyson fought in his first reign apart from Bruno and Biggs were shot because they were all 7 or more years older than him. And pretty much everyone Canelo has fought was shot.

Also what if the supposedly shot fighter then fights someone close to their age. Do they suddenly become prime again?

Hopkins was past prime. His physical prime was in the late 90's, though due to altering his style I think he could have maintained his prime up to 2004 when he fought Joppy. Anyone thinking Hopkins was prime is as much of an idiot as those who think he was shot when he fought the slappy one.

 

The only thing you know is that I owned you and exposed you as a racist who DKSAB:hi:

 

This moron is comparing a 43 year old to a 34 year old LOL. Jesus christ, some people can't get any dumber. Hopkins won anyways, and he was well past his prime, definitely not shot though.