Ignorant British boxing journalists

Did you just use a pointless emoticon to get your empty point across?

 

I like how you seem to think you're really knowledgable. :rofl

Subjective.....'Witter beats Hatton 9 times out of 10'

 

edit

 

Does anybody actually know what 'subjective' means?

 

A dictionary can define it, it's just that none of the definitions bear much relation to the way it's being used in this thread!

 

Take the articles on boxing with a pinch of salt, especially the shite written in the sun on saturdays by warren.

 

:rofl

 

Yes. it's like "objective", but with a difference.

 

And how did you figure that one out Margerie? Are you psychic too? :roll:

 

You said it!!

 

the man's a legend on the bbc's live football commentary.

he's got his own facebook pages and what not. :yep

 

My bad, Scurla actually said Witter beats Hatton ten times out of ten.

Genous.

 

Good point. I think Scurla is very subjective.

Me personally I am objective, and very good with the written word. I would be a far better boxing journo than pretty much every existing boxing writer in the UK. And I mean that 100%.

 

:bart